Podreditev z "razsvetlitvijo"

Bentham in prosojnost oblasti

Abstract

Članek obravnava Benthamovo pojmovanje publicitete in primerja njegove strategije za uravnavanje vedenja poslancev s strategijami za uravnavanje vedenja zapornikov. Pokaze na disciplinsko moč nenehno prisotnega pogleda javnosti: tako v zaporu kot v politični skupščini igra javnost vlogo razsodnika. Publiciteta kot sistem prosojnosti omogoča odgovorno delovanje vladajočih in zaupanje vladanih. Prosojnost oblasti zagotavlja uresničitev utilitarističnega načela "največje sreče največjemu številu ljudi". Medtem ko je bil nekoč idealni mehanizem vladanja skritost, je pri Benthamu idealni mehanizem vladanja odprtost oblasti javnosti.

Keywords

javno mnenje;nadzor;tisk;poslanci;vedenje;zaporniki;Oblast;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2002
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
UDC:	316.6
COBISS:	21910877
ISSN:	0352-3608
Parent publication:	Družboslovne razprave
Views:	697
Downloads:	173
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The article examines Bentham's views on "publicity" and compares his strategy to regulate the behavior of Members of Parliament with his strategy to regulate the behavior of prisoners. It shows the disciplinary power exerted by a continuously present gaze of the public: the public plays the role of a judge in a prison as well as in a political assembly. Publicity as a system of transparency makes the governors accountable and the governed confident. Transparency of power assures the realization of the utilitarian principle of "the greatest happiness of the greatest number". While the ideal mechanism of governing in the past was secrecy, Bentham's ideal mechanism of governing is one of exposure to the public.
Secondary keywords:	public opinion;supervision;press;parliament members;behavior;prisoner;Authority;
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 203-214
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ18
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ41
Chronology:	dec. 2002
Keywords (UDC):	social sciences;družbene vede;sociology;sociologija;social psychology;socialna psihologija;
ID:	37020