Nove-stare reprezentacije otrok in otroštva

dekonstrukcija "protektivnega" otroštva

Abstract

Članek prikazuje, kako se v sodobnosti reproducirajo reprezentacije otroštva, kakršne so nam znane iz preteklosti. Na podlagi analize javne razprave iz let 2000-2002 o zakonu o umetnem oplojevanju pokaže, da se otrok tudi v sodobnosti še vedno konstituira pretežno kot lastnina odraslega, kar smo očitali patriarhatu. Članek še zlasti kritično obravnava t.i. liberalno argumentacijo v razpravi, ki lastništva otroka ni problematizirala, pač pa je zahtevala zgolj njegovo razširitev na ostale segmente odrasle populacije, ki jim otrok tradicionalno ni pripadal (predvsem ženske, homoseksualce in telesno hendikepirane ljudi). Skozi to optiko članek problematizira tudi protektivno otroštvo kot prevladujoči sodobni družbeni konstrukt otroštva ter koncepta otrokovih pravic in potreb.

Keywords

umetna oploditev;Otroštvo;Otrokove pravice;Potrebe;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2003
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
UDC:	316.6
COBISS:	22005341
ISSN:	0040-3598
Parent publication:	Teorija in praksa
Views:	745
Downloads:	160
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The article deals with the reproduction of old representations of childhood in(post) modernity. Through an analysis of a wide-ranging public debate triggered in Slovenia in 2000-2002 with regard to the proposed law on artificial insemination, it demonstrates that today the child is still constituted chiefly as a property of adults, which is exactly what the patriarchy was reproached for. It critically focuses on the liberal argumentation in the debate, which failed to problematize the issue of the ownership of children, and demanded only its extension to other segments of the adult population, which the child traditionally did not belong to (in particular women, homosexuals and physically handicapped persons). Through this perspective, the article also problematizes the social construct of protective childhood, and the controversial concepts of children's rights and needs.
Secondary keywords:	artificial insemination;Childhood;Children's rights;Needs;
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 357-374
Volume:	ǂLet. ǂ40
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ2
Chronology:	marec/april 2003
Keywords (UDC):	social sciences;družbene vede;sociology;sociologija;social psychology;socialna psihologija;
ID:	37116