diplomsko delo - univerzitetni študij
Abstract
V prvem delu naloge smo raziskali analizo zasebne posesti v gozdnogospodarskemobmočju (GGO) Kranj, dosedanje gospodarjenje z gozdovi ter informiranost z za gospodarjenje pomembnimi informacijami. Izvedeno je bilo preko dvesto vodenih intervjujev z zasebnimi lastniki gozdov, rezultate analizpa smo prikazali ločeno po velikostnih in socialnoekonomskih kategorijah. Gospodarjenje v zasebnih gozdovih GGO Kranj kaže na razkorak med načrtovanimi in izvedenimi gozdnogojitvenimi ukrepi kot posledica posestne razdrobljenosti (60 % lastnikov ima prostorsko razdrobljeno posest v povprečnotreh kompleksih), pomanjkljive participacije v gozdarskem načrtovanju (le 6 % lastnikov potrjuje udeležbo javnih obravnav) in skromnega zanimanja lastnikov za inovativnejše postopke gospodarjenja. V drugem delu raziskave smo se osredotočili na presojo učinkovitosti in koristnosti načrta za gozdno posest. Odgovori kažejo, da je ta bolj zanimiv za večje gozdne posestnike. Interpretacije poznavanja, zanimanja in razumevanja posestnih načrtov se bistveno razlikujejo po velikostnih in socialnoekonomskih kategorijah posesti. Večja pripravljenost za pokritje dela stroškov izdelave posestnega načrta je odvisna od pričakovanih dohodkovnih koristi. Večji zasebni lastniki so od svojega gozda ekonomsko odvisni, zato se za večino zdi pridobitev posestnega načrta smiselna. Pri manjših zasebnih posestnikih je opazna nizka stopnja informiranosti o gozdnogospodarskih načrtih. Lastniki manjših zasebnih posesti bodo lahko tudi potencialni uporabniki posestnega načrta, če bo javna gozdarska služba spremenila dosedanji odnos.
Keywords
gozdne posesti;zasebni gozdovi;posestna struktura;posestni načrti;gozdni posestniki;lastniki gozdov;gozdnogospodarsko načrtovanje;upravljanje gozdov;participacija;Kranj;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2010 |
Source: |
Ljubljana |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
UL BF - Biotechnical Faculty |
Publisher: |
[V. Žepič] |
UDC: |
630*62(043.2)=163.6 |
COBISS: |
3082918
|
Views: |
1099 |
Downloads: |
309 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
Unknown |
Secondary title: |
ǂThe ǂevaluation of possibilities for introduction of private forest property plans in the Kranj forest management region |
Secondary abstract: |
Research in the first part describes the analysis of private property in the Forest Region (GGO) Kranj, forest management and avaliability of informations,important for forest management. Personally, we visited 201 private owner, conducted interviews with each of them and analyzed the resultsseparately by size and socioeconomic categories. Management of private forests GGO Kranj shows the gap between planned and realized silvicultural measures as a result of fragmentation of property (60 % of owners property based on three complexes), the lack of participation in forest planning (only 6 % private owners participate in public hearings) and modest interest owners for innovative management procedures. In the second part, we focused on evalutations of effectiveness and utility of forest property plans, which shows significantly better results in major private owners (13.4 %). Interpretations of knowledge, interest and understanding of forest property plans we have identified according to the size and socio-economic categories of property. Increased willingness to cover part of costs for the forest property plan depends on what the benefits of the incomes are. Major private owners who are economically dependent on their forest, seems to acquire the property plan is reasonable. For smaller private owners we can perceive a very low level of information avaliable on forest management plans. Potential users of the forest property plans will also be small private owners, if public forestry service will change the attitude and paying more attentions toward them. |
Type (COBISS): |
Undergraduate thesis |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fak., Odd. za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire |
Pages: |
XI, 58 f. |
Keywords (UDC): |
applied sciences;medicine;technology;uporabne znanosti;medicina;tehnika;agriculture and related sciences and techniques;forestry;farming;wildlife exploitation;kmetijstvo ter sorodne vede in tehnologije;forestry;gozdarstvo;forest management;business economics of forestry; administration and organization of forest enterprises;urejanje gozdov;ekonomika gozdarskega poslovanja;upravljanje in organizacija gozdnogospodarskih podjetij; |
ID: |
55727 |