Primerjava eksternih preverjanj znanja na področju fizike

Abstract

Keywords

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2012
Source:	Ljubljana
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UL PEF - Faculty of Education
Publisher:	[T. Pačnik]
UDC:	37.091.275:53(043.2)
COBISS:	9181769
Views:	1839
Downloads:	374
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Comparison of external knowledge assesments in the field of physics
Secondary abstract:	Three external knowledge assessments in the field of physics are discussed in this diploma thesis, one national (NPZ) and two international surveys (TIMSS and PISA). The main purpose of the study was to determine differences and similarities of the surveys, to determine what individual survey say about the knowledge of physics, and to identify the pros and cons of the surveys. In the introductory part of the thesis the basic statistics and research results of all three surveys are presented for the students of the same generation. The data of these surveys were obtained from original publications and institutions that perform the studies. The data were statistically analysed according to the methodologies that are used in individual surveys. Comparable test questions were selected and compared. The comparable test questions covered the fields of sound, light and density. The study shows that the results referring to sound and density test questions are complementary, whereas the results of the test questions referring to light are duplicated. This also suggests that surveys themselves are complementary. Since TIMSS and NPZ assess the knowledge according to curriculum, TIMSS and NPZ surveys measure similar knowledge. On the other hand, PISA results are not directly comparable to TIMSS and NPZ results, because in PISA interdisciplinary knowledge is stressed more than curricular.
Secondary keywords:	physics;marking;primary school;fizika;ocenjevanje;osnovna šola;
File type:	application/pdf
Type (COBISS):	Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment:	Univ. Ljubljana, Pedagoška fak. ; Fak. za matematiko in fiziko, Fizika in tehnika
Pages:	V, 61 f.
Type (ePrints):	thesis
Title (ePrints):	Comparison of external knowledge assesments in the field of physics
Keywords (ePrints):	TIMSS
Keywords (ePrints, secondary language):	TIMSS
Abstract (ePrints):	V diplomskem delu so obravnavana tri eksterna preverjanja znanja na področju fizike: eno nacionalno; NPZ in dve mednarodni; TIMSS ter PISA. Glavni namen naloge je bil ugotoviti razlike in podobnosti eksternih preverjanj znanja. Ugotoviti, kaj povedo posamezne raziskave o znanju fizike in prepoznati prednosti ter pomanjkljivosti obravnavanih preverjanj znanja. Po predstavitvi vseh treh raziskav so v nalogi prikazani osnovni statistični podatki in rezultati raziskav za isto generacijo učencev. Podatki o vseh treh eksternih preverjanjih znanja so bili pridobljeni iz originalnih publikacij in na ustanovah, ki vodijo te raziskave. Podatki so bili statistično obdelani v skladu z metodologijami, ki se jih uporablja v posameznih raziskavah. Izbrane in predstavljene so bile naloge, ki so primerljive med seboj; na temo zvoka, svetlobe in gostote. Iz analize rezultatov izbranih nalog je bilo ugotovljeno, da se pri nalogah na temo zvoka in gostote rezultati dopolnjujejo, rezultati na temo svetlobe pa se podvajajo. Iz tega lahko sklepamo, da se tudi same raziskave dopolnjujejo. Zaradi preverjanja iste vrste znanja, se pri raziskavah TIMSS in NPZ meri bolj podobno znanje kot pri raziskavi PISA, zato so rezultati NPZ bolj primerljivi z rezultati raziskave TIMSS kot z rezultati raziskave PISA.
Abstract (ePrints, secondary language):	Three external knowledge assessments in the field of physics are discussed in this diploma thesis, one national (NPZ) and two international surveys (TIMSS and PISA). The main purpose of the study was to determine differences and similarities of the surveys, to determine what individual survey say about the knowledge of physics, and to identify the pros and cons of the surveys. In the introductory part of the thesis the basic statistics and research results of all three surveys are presented for the students of the same generation. The data of these surveys were obtained from original publications and institutions that perform the studies. The data were statistically analysed according to the methodologies that are used in individual surveys. Comparable test questions were selected and compared. The comparable test questions covered the fields of sound, light and density. The study shows that the results referring to sound and density test questions are complementary, whereas the results of the test questions referring to light are duplicated. This also suggests that surveys themselves are complementary. Since TIMSS and NPZ assess the knowledge according to curriculum, TIMSS and NPZ surveys measure similar knowledge. On the other hand, PISA results are not directly comparable to TIMSS and NPZ results, because in PISA interdisciplinary knowledge is stressed more than curricular.
Keywords (ePrints, secondary language):	TIMSS
ID:	8309905