Iskanje resnice v kazenskem postopku

diplomsko delo

Peter Tkalec (Author), Zlatko Dežman (Mentor)

Abstract

S pojmom resnice se ukvarja predvsem filozofija, sposojajo pa si ga tudi druge znanosti in stroke. Tako je pojem resnice najprej filozofska kategorija, šele nato moralno-etična, psihološka, pravna … V filozofiji se je oblikovalo več skupin teorij resnic, najbolj znane so korespondenčne, varčne in epistemske teorije resnice. Za pravo, predvsem civilno, je značilna konsenzualna teorija resnice, za kazensko pa, tako trdi večina avtorjev, korespondenčna. Korespondenčna teorija resnice ima za resničen tisti stavek, ki je skladen z realnostjo. Vendar je v kazenskem procesnem pravu preveč zavestnih odstopanj od realne slike, zato je primerneje govoriti, da v kazenskem procesnem pravu velja ena od epistemskih teorij resnice, in sicer konstruktivistična. Slednja še vedno priznava veljavo korespondenčni, a hkrati opozarja tudi na aktivno udeležbo človeka pri oblikovanju končne resnice. Največje ovire pri iskanju resnice v kazenskem postopku predstavljajo dokazne prepovedi, ki ščitijo predvsem človekove pravice, poleg teh pa poznamo še nekatere druge ovire, ki ne izhajajo nujno iz zakona, temveč so človeške narave.

Keywords

kazensko pravo;kazenski postopek;procesne pravice;pravno sredstvo;konstruktivizem;diplomska dela;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2013
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[P. Tkalec]
UDC:	343.15(043.2)
COBISS:	4521003
Views:	2406
Downloads:	434
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	FINDING THE TRUTH IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Secondary abstract:	The term truth is generally studied by philosophy, but the term is also used by other sciences and professions. This means that truth is philosphical term first, in second place is moral-ethical, psychological, juridical etc. There is more groups of theories of truth formed in philosopy. The most known are correspondence theories, minimalist theories and epistemic theories. The consensus theory is typical for the purpose of law, especially for the civil law. On the other hand, correspondence theory, argued by the majority of lecturers, is accepted in criminal law. Correspondence theory argues that a true statement is the one that is in accordance with reality. But in criminal processual law there is too many wilful deviations from reality. That is why one of the epistemic theories, so called constructivist theory, is proper for the purpose of criminal processual law. Constructivist theory still acknowledges correspondence theory but also points at our active participation in forming the final truth. The greatest impediments at truth finding in criminal procedure are evidentiary prohibitions, which shields human rights mostly. There are also some other obstacles, not originating in law on criminal procedure, which are of human nature.
Secondary keywords:	truth;criminal procedure;evidentiary prohibitions;processual rights;constructivism;defendant;remedy;
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages:	87 str.
ID:	8716281