Razlike med spoloma v opisovanju storilcev kaznivih dejanj

diplomsko delo visokošolskega strokovnega študija Varnost in policijsko delo

Tjaša Trnovšek (Author), Igor Areh (Mentor)

Abstract

Za ugotavljanje razlik med spoloma v opisovanju storilcev kaznivega dejanja je pomembno poznavanje in delovanje spomina ter zaznavanje. V teoretičnem delu diplomske naloge sem se najprej posvetila spominu, njegovemu delovanju in spominskim napakam. Posebno poglavje sem posvetila tudi zaznavanju – dejavnikom, ki vplivajo na zaznavanje, času trajanja dogodka, dejavnikom obdelave podatkov in motnjam zaznave. V zadnjem poglavju teoretičnega dela pa pišem o vplivu spola na zaznavanje, natančneje o razlikah med spoloma ter o vplivu možganov. V empiričnem delu sem analizirala odgovore študentov Fakultete za varnostne vede, ki so jih zapisali v anketni vprašalnik po ogledu doma posnetega videa. Zanimalo me je, ali res pride do razlik med spoloma pri opisovanju specifičnih detajlov glede na spol ter ali si ženske res bolje zapomnijo barve oblačil in las storilcev ter predmetov, moški pa avtomobile in registrske številke. V raziskavi je sodelovalo 32 udeležencev, od tega je bilo 19 žensk in 13 moških. Na podlagi analize anketnih vprašalnikov sem ugotovila, da res prihaja do razlik med spoloma, in sicer glede na njihove interese. Ženske so si veliko bolje zapomnile barve oblačil storilcev in predmete, ki so jih imeli storilci pri sebi, moški pa avtomobile (znamke, modele). Tudi pri navajanju registrske številke so bili moški bolj uspešni, čeprav so bile tudi pri njih navedbe le delne. Vendar tudi del številke pomaga pri odkrivanju storilcev. Moški so bili uspešnejši tudi pri opisovanju odtujenih predmetov. Na podlagi podatkov, ki sem jih pridobila z analizo, lahko moje domneve deloma potrdim in deloma ovržem, saj je prihajalo tudi do razlik, tam kjer nisem pričakovala.

Keywords

pričanje;spomin;zaznavanje;ženske;moški;razlike med spoloma;diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2013
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice
Publisher:	T. Trnovšek]
UDC:	159.953.34(043.2)
COBISS:	2689514
Views:	1628
Downloads:	149
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	For assessing differences between genders in describing offenders of criminal act it is important to know about operation and perception of memory. In theoretical part of my thesis I have first dedicated my work to memory, its operation and memory mistakes. I have given a special emphasis to perception in whole chapter – factors influencing perception, time of event, factors of data processing and perception mistakes. In the last chapter of theoretical part I have written about influence of gender in a connection to perception, that is to say about differences of genders and influence of brains. In empirical part I have analysed answers of Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security students given in survey questionnaire after watching video. I was interested if there were really any differences between genders in describing specific details regarding gender and if women really better memorized colours of clothes and hair of offenders and objects, whereas men better memorized cars and registration plate numbers. In my research there were 32 participants, 19 women and 13 men. Based on analysis of survey questionnaire I have found out that there really were diffenrences between genders that is to say based on their interests. Women more memorized colours of clothes and objects of offenders whereas men better memorized cars (brands, models). Also in listing registration plate numbers men were more successful although their quotes were partial, but there is a fact that also part of registration plate numbers help in detecting offenders. Men were also more successful in describing estranged objects. Based on gained data given through analysis I can partly confirm and refute my suppositions since there were some differences where I have not expected.
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede, Ljubljana
Pages:	51 str.
ID:	8726862