Pravica javnosti do obveščenosti vs. pravica do zasebnosti (Analiza primera)

diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa

Veronika Senekovič (Author), Rajko Knez (Mentor), Cvetka Žirovnik (Co-mentor)

Abstract

Cilj diplomske naloge je raziskati dve vprašanji s področja medijskega prava. Osredotočila sem se na dve pogosto nasprotujoči si pravici, pravico do obveščenosti in pravico do zasebnosti. V ospredju je pravica do svobode izražanja, ustavna pravica, brez katere si težko predstavljamo demokratično družbo. Skozi odmeven in sporen primer o domnevnem očetovstvu visokega cerkvenega dostojanstvenika - Franceta Rodeta, analiziram kdaj so si lahko pravice navzkrižne in kdaj prihaja do kršenja teh. Analiza zajema etični test ali SAD FORMULO, s pomočjo katere rešujemo hipotetična ali realna etična vprašanja, s katerimi se srečujejo novinarji in uredniki ob pisanju prispevkov. Ne glede, kdo odloča o moralni sodbi, je to redko enostavno, saj vedno obstaja dvom v pravilnost odločitve. V nadaljevanju sem uporabila tudi metodo ankete in aplikacijo mnenja javnosti. Kardinal Rode je zoper novinarja in časnik sprožil kazenski in civilnopravni (odškodninski) postopek.

Keywords

medijske komunikacije;medijsko pravo;obveščanje javnosti;pravica do obveščenosti;pravica do zasebnosti;novinarski kodeks;novinarstvo;etika;cerkev;kardinal Rode;diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2013
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[V. Senekovič]
UDC:	[342.732+343.45]:316.77(043.2)
COBISS:	17413398
Views:	3126
Downloads:	492
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO BE INFORMED VS. THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY - CASE ANALYSIS
Secondary abstract:	The goal of this paper is researching the area of media law. It is going to focus on two conflicting aspects. On one hand, there is people's right to be informed and on the other, the right to individual privacy. Furthermore, there is also the constitutional right of freedom of speech, base for democratic society we live in. With analysis of the controversial and popular case of alleged fatherhood of Father Bishop Franc Rode, it will try to demonstrate, when those rights can be contradicting and when they are being violated. Situation, Analysis, Decision (SAD) method for making ethical decision is useful tool for approaching real or hypothetical ethical questions for reaching a defensible ethical decision in journalism. No matter who is responsible for moral judgment, it is rarely simple and there is always a doubt in accuracy of the decision. Father Bishop Franc Rode filed a lawsuit against the reporter and the media house.
Secondary keywords:	journalism;etics;public information;privacy protection;publicity;rights;media law;media communications;
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za elektrotehniko, računalništvo in informatiko, Medijske komunikacije
Pages:	VII, 36 f.
ID:	8727102