diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija Organizacija in management poslovnih in delovnih sistemov
Klemen Zajec (Author), Tomaž Kern (Mentor)

Abstract

Problem, ki ga obravnavamo v diplomskem delu, je, da so posamezna orodja za projektno vodenje preprosto prevelik strošek za podjetja. Zato smo primerjali različna orodja za projektno vodenje in izbrali tisto, ki se v svoji funkcionalnosti najbolj približa vodilnemu na tem področju; Mircosoft Projectu. Izpostavili smo najpomembnejše kriterije Microsoft Projecta in preko njih našli podobna orodja. Po izdelavi pilotnega projekta smo izbrana orodja primerjali med sabo in preučili njihove prednosti in slabosti. Kot rešitev smo izbrali eno izmed orodij, ki je po našem mnenju najboljši približek Microsoft Projecta. S preizkušanjem in analiziranjem smo opazili trende, s katerimi se bodo orodja za projektno vodenje še bolj približala projektnim skupinam.

Keywords

projekt;projektno vodenje;orodja za podporo projektnemu vodenju;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UM FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences
Publisher: [K. Zajec]
UDC: 005.5
COBISS: 7207443 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1100
Downloads: 183
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: ANALYSES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS
Secondary abstract: The discussed problem in this thesis is that individual tools for project management are too great an expense for companies. That is why we compared several tools for project management and selected the one which is in its functionality the closest to the leading product in this field; Microsoft Project. We pointed out the most important criteria of Microsoft Project and, according to these criteria, found similar tools. After creating a pilot project, we compared selected tools and studied their strengths and weaknesses. As a result, we selected one of the tools which in our opinion compares the most to Microsoft Project. By testing and analysing, we noticed trends which will bring tools for project management even closer to project groups.
Secondary keywords: Project;Project management;Project management support tools;Tools selection criteria;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za organizacijske vede
Pages: 48 f.
ID: 8727187
Recommended works:
, diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija Organizacija in management poslovnih in delovnih sistemov
, diplomsko delo
, no subtitle data available
, no subtitle data available
, zaključna projektna naloga