magistrsko delo
Jerneja Kure (Author), Andreja Primec (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrska naloga v teoretičnem delu predstavlja primerjalno-pravni prikaz poglavitnih značilnosti zaščite patenta in varstva poslovne skrivnosti v Sloveniji, Avstriji in na Hrvaškem. Končna splošna ugotovitev predelane literature in virov je, da je na obeh področjih obravnavanih držav več podobnosti kot razlik. Obenem naloga predstavi tudi razmerje med področjema prava intelektualne lastnine / prava industrijske lastnine in konkurenčnega prava / prava nelojalne konkurence. Pravni teoretiki so različnega mnenja, vendar na splošno povezava med obema področjema obstaja. Sledi obravnava dileme, v kateri se ukvarjamo z vprašanjem, kateri mehanizem zaščite je boljši, patent ali poslovna skrivnost. Poudariti je potrebno, da ni mogoče določiti, kateri institut je primerneje uporabiti, saj je za vsak konkreten primer lahko boljši oziroma učinkovitejši drug mehanizem zaščite. Glede na situacijo mora vsak izumitelj pretehtati pozitivne in negativne strani zaščite in se nato odločiti za primernejšo zaščito oziroma varstvo. Na podlagi predelane teorije sledi praktično delo v obliki ankete; Patent ali poslovna skrivnost v slovenskih podjetjih. Z anketo želimo pridobiti čim več različnih podatkov, tako o inovativnosti podjetij, številu patentov, razlogov za odločitev za en ali drug mehanizem zaščite, ovirah in pozitivnih lastnostih patenta ali poslovne skrivnosti. Zanimali so nas tudi podatki o internih aktih, določbah v pogodbi o zaposlitvi in pogodbah o ne razkrivanju informacij, ki določajo varovanje poslovnih skrivnosti itd. Kljub slabi odzivnosti slovenskih podjetij vseeno lahko ugotovimo, da so rezultati primerljivi z že opravljeno, obsežnejšo raziskavo področja intelektualne lastnine v Sloveniji.

Keywords

patenti;industrijska lastnina;nelojalna konkurenca;primerjave;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM EPF - Faculty of Economics and Business
Publisher: [J. Kure Zupančič]
UDC: 347.77
COBISS: 11754268 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1670
Downloads: 292
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Comparative legal view of main characteristics of patent and trade secret protection in Slovenia, Croatia and Austria
Secondary abstract: In its theoretical part, this master’s thesis presents the comparative law’s overview of the main features of patent protection and protection of business secrets in Slovenia, Austria and Croatia. The final general conclusion of the analysed literature and sources is that there are more similarities than differences in both fields in all of the countries included in the research. The thesis also presents the ratio between the fields of intellectual property law / industrial property law and competition law / unfair competition law. Legal theoreticians provide us with several differing opinions, but, in general, there exists a connection between the two fields. What follows is the analysis of the dilemma of which mechanism of protection is better - a patent or business secret. It has to be pointed out that it is impossible to determine which one is more appropriate to use, as a different protection mechanism can be better or more effective for each individual case. Considering the situation, each inventor must weigh the positive and negative sides of protection and then decide on the more suitable protection or security. What follows is the practical work in the form of a questionnaire, which is based on the analysed theory; patent or business secret in Slovenian companies. The questionnaire aims to acquire as much data as possible on the companies’ innovativeness, number of patents, reasons for choosing one or the other mechanism, obstacles and positive aspects of a patent or business secret, as well as internal acts, employment contract terms and agreements on confidentiality, which stipulate the protection of business secrets, etc. In spite of the companies’ limited feedback, it was still possible to establish that the results are comparable to those of an earlier, wider research dealing with intellectual property in Slovenia.
Secondary keywords: Patent;business secret;industrial property;unfair competition;Slovenia;Austria;Croatia.;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fak.
Pages: III, 71 str., 3 str. pril.
ID: 8729301