diplomsko delo
Tajda Glazer (Author), Matjaž Tratnik (Mentor)

Abstract

Temelji ureditve individualne kazenske odgovornosti najvišjih političnih in vojaških predstavnikov v mednarodnem pravu so bili postavljeni po II. svetovni vojni s sprejetjem Nürnberškega in Tokijskega statuta, kljub temu pa je k njenemu razvoju nedvoumno največ prispevala sodna praksa v okviru Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo, Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za Ruando ter Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča. Na tem področju smo bili priča izrednemu napredku, čeprav je bil časovni okvir, v katerem so bili sprejeti temeljni dokumenti in v katerem je nastajala sodna praksa, razmeroma kratek. Da bi razumeli, kako se je individualna kazenska odgovornost najvišjih političnih in vojaških predstavnikov razvijala, smo pogledali njeno ureditev skozi zgodovino ter opisali institucije, pred katere so najvišji politični in vojaški predstavniki lahko poklicani na odgovornost. Po predstavitvi temeljnih značilnosti individualne kazenske odgovornosti smo podrobneje pogledali njene modalitete in osvetlili še prihodnost ter probleme, s katerimi se mednarodni tribunali soočajo pri sojenju najvišjim političnim in vojaškim predstavnikom. Ugotovili smo, da kljub neizmernim napredkom ni mogoče reči, da vse poteka brez težav. Nekateri pravni instituti na področju individualne kazenske odgovornosti najvišjih političnih in vojaških predstavnikov so še vedno nejasni oziroma nedorečeni, kultura nekaznovanosti je še vedno prisotna, nenazadnje pa oviro predstavljajo tudi problemi pri sojenju, na primer oteženo dokazovanje najvišjim političnim in vojaškim predstavnikom ter vmešavanje držav in politike v delo sodišč.

Keywords

kazensko pravo;individualna kazenska odgovornost;mednarodno kazensko pravo;najvišji politični in vojaški predstavniki;modalitete individualne kazenske odgovornosti;kultura nekaznovanosti;diplomska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [T. Glazer]
UDC: 341.46(043.2)
COBISS: 4800043 Link will open in a new window
Views: 957
Downloads: 155
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: THE EVOLUTION OF INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF SENIOR POLITICAL AND MILITARY REPRESENTATIVES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
Secondary abstract: The foundations for the regime of individual criminal responsibility of senior political and military representatives in international law were laid down after the Second World War with the adoption of Nurnberg and Tokyo Charters. Nevertheless, the legal concept of individual criminal responsibility of senior political and military representatives was undoubtedly largely influenced by the case law, developed by the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and International Criminal Court. We witnessed remarkable evolution in this field, despite the relatively short time frame in which the basic documents were adopted and the case law was created. To understand how individual criminal responsibility of senior political and military representatives evolved, we took a look at its regulation throughout history and described the institutions, before which senior political and military representatives can be called to answer. After we presented principal characteristics of individual criminal responsibility, we took a deeper look into various modes of liability and highlighted the future and problems that the tribunals are confronted with when they try senior political and military representatives. We cannot claim that there are no difficulties, regardless of the immense progress that was made in the field of individual criminal responsibility of senior political and military representatives. Hence, some legal concepts are still unclear or unresolved, culture of impunity is still very much present, and there are also other obstacles regarding trial problems, such as difficulties of providing evidence in cases against senior political and military representatives and interference of states and politics with the work of international tribunals.
Secondary keywords: individual criminal responsibility;international criminal law;senior political and military representatives;modes of individual criminal responsibility;culture of impunity;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages: 74 f.
ID: 8730740