Priča in izvedenec v kazenskem postopku

diplomsko delo

Simona Črnec (Author), Zlatko Dežman (Mentor)

Abstract

Kazenski postopek kot celota, predstavlja skupek dejanj državnih organov in drugih udeležencev v primeru, ko obstaja verjetnost, da je bilo storjeno kaznivo dejanje. Prav v tej fazi ugotavljanja dejanskega stanja, pa bistveno prispevajo h končni odločitvi sodišča procesni subjekti, ki sodelujejo v kazenskem postopku. Diplomsko delo tako predstavlja analizo dveh pomembnih udeležencev v kazenskem postopku, to sta priča in izvedenec. V prvem delu diplomske naloge, je poudarek na priči ter njenem položaju v kazenskem postopku. Izpovedba priče o pomembnih okoliščinah, kot dokazno sredstvo, je njen najpomembnejši prispevek v kazenskem postopku. Oseba, ki je v nekem trenutku poklicana pred sodišče kot priča, ni vedno dolžna pričati. Tej dolžnosti se lahko pod posebnimi pogoji izogne, zaradi preprečevanja morebitnih konfliktov med osebami, ki so v tesnih odnosih. Zaradi svoje dolžnosti pričevanja, se lahko priča znajde tudi v situaciji, ko pomeni njeno znanje in vedenje o kaznivem dejanju, grožnjo za njeno življenje. V takem primeru, ji Zakon o zaščiti prič, nudi ustrezno varovanje z vključitvijo v program zaščite. V drugem delu pa je v ospredju izvedenec. Gre namreč za osebo, ki jo organ, ki vodi postopek, s pisno odredbo postavi na položaj izvedenca, v primeru, ko je za rešitev konkretnega primera potrebno strokovno znanje, ki ga sodišče nima, in s katerim razpolaga izvedenec. Med izvedencem in pričo je kar nekaj razlik, kar se tiče njune dolžnosti in položaja, vendar lahko med njima zagotovo potegnemo kakšno vzporednico. Oba namreč zaznavata določena dejstva, ki pa jih podajata in interpretirata iz dveh različnih vidikov. Pri priči gre bolj za osebno, čustveno naklonitev do videnega, medtem ko mora izvedenec pri podaji svojega izvida in mnenja ostati objektiven in zadostiti potrebam po nepristranskosti.

Keywords

kazensko pravo;kazenski postopek;priča;dolžnost pričevanja;zaščita prič;privilegirana priča;izvedenec;izvid;izvedensko mnenje;nepristranskost;diplomska dela;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2015
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[S. Črnec]
UDC:	343.3/.7(043.2)
COBISS:	4924459
Views:	1505
Downloads:	442
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	WITNESS AND EXPERT WITNESS IN CRIMINAL LAW PROCEEDING
Secondary abstract:	Criminal proceeding represents a joint of State authorities acts and other participants, when there is a possibility that a criminal offence has been done. In this phase of determining, the statutory definition of a criminal offence, the crucial contribution to the final court decision, is by different subjects, taking part in criminal process. The following work represents analysis of two significant participants in criminal proceeding, so called witness and expert witness. In first part, the stress in on witness and her position in criminal proceeding. A deposition of a witness, as the mean of evidence, is her main contribution to the proceeding itself. A person, who is called as a witness, is under certain conditions, relieved of her duty to testify. That legal goodness is provided, in order to prevent possible conflicts between persons, who are in a close relationship. A witness can be found in situation, where her knowledge about criminal offence, can mean a threat to her life. In that particular case, a Witness protection Act, provides her a suitable and convenient protection, by including her in witness protection program. In second part, the emphasis is on an expert witness. That is a person, appointed in the position of an expert witness, with a written ordinance, given by Court authority, conducting the process. An expert witness is required, when there is an expert knowledge needed, which the Court does not dispose. On the one hand, there are many distinctions between witness and expert witness, regarding their duties and position in criminal proceeding, but on the other hand, there are many similarities as well. For example, both perceive certain facts, which are then represented and explained from two different perspectives. A witness is more personally and emotionally inclined towards the seen, while an expert witness has to remain objective and fulfil the need of impartiality, when giving his clearance and expert opinion.
Secondary keywords:	criminal process;witness;duty to testify;witness protection;priviliged witness;expert witness;clearance;expert opinion;impartiality;
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages:	67 f.
ID:	8756911