diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa
Abstract
V diplomskem delu smo na podlagi skic izbranega stanovanjskega objekta,izdelali dimenzionirane tlorise in prereze,na podlagi katerih smo predstavili dva povsem naravna načina gradnje.Na našem območju bolj uveljavljen masivni opečni sistem gradnje,z opeko,kot naravnim gradbenim materialom in na našem območju manj zastopan masivni leseni sistem gradnje,s križno lepljenim lesom.Na podlagi skic,smo s pomočjo programa Archicad izdelali tlorise in prereze,za oba omenjena sistema gradnje,z vsemi potrebnimi dimenzijami.V diplomski nalogi sta tako oba sistema gradnje podrobno opisana,tudi z uporabo različnih skic in slikovnim gradivom,z namenom,čim bolj nazorno prikazati oba sistema gradnje,ter tako tudi določene prednosti,oziroma pomanjkljivosti.
Keywords
gradbeništvo;gradnja;opeka;povezano opečno zidovje;lesene konstrukcije;križno lepljen les;diplomske naloge;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2015 |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
UM FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture |
Publisher: |
[A. Krajnc] |
UDC: |
728.012:[693.2+694](043.2) |
COBISS: |
19466774
|
Views: |
1392 |
Downloads: |
160 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DWELLING HOUSE DESIGN WITH BRICK AND WITH PREFABRICATED CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER STRUCTURE |
Secondary abstract: |
On the basis of chosen dwelling house sketches,we made complete architectural plans and present two different,but completely natural systems of construction.In our area more established system of construction,with clay brick and less known system of construction with cross laminated timber.We used architectural design software Archicad for drawing architectural floor and sectional plans,for both construction systems.In the diploma we also used different graphic material, sketches and construction details in order to clearly demonstrated all advantages and disatvantages of both construction systems. |
Secondary keywords: |
civil engineering;construction;brick;confined brick masonry;timber structures;cross laminated timber; |
URN: |
URN:SI:UM: |
Type (COBISS): |
Undergraduate thesis |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za gradbeništvo, prometno inženirstvo in arhitekturo |
Pages: |
XI, 203 str., [23] zganj. pril. z načrti |
ID: |
9062304 |