Davorin Dajčman (Author)

Abstract

Izhodišča. Vse pogostejše razprave o ukrepih, ki izhajajo iz tveganja za nastanek zapletov in kasnejših sporov pri vsakdanjem delu, se še zmeraj zdijo nepomembne in nezanimive. Vendar vse več zdravnikov prepoznava številne koristi v povečani dejavnosti za zmanjševanje tveganja pri svojem delu z dobrim vodenjem zdravstvene dokumentacije, dokumentiranjem pojasnilne dolžnosti in stalnim prepoznavanjem možnosti tveganja na širšem področju dejavnosti. Standardi oskrbe bolnika temelje na zakonsko opredeljenih pravilih delovanja službe in smernicah stroke, kar zdravniku endoskopistu zagotavlja možnost čim boljše oskrbe bolnika. Tako je endoskopistova dolžnost, da deluje na podlagi strokovnih smernic znotraj zakonskih določil. Odstopanja od predvidenih določil se v pravu pojmujejo kot "prekršek", kar je za tožnika zanesljiv dokaz pri sklicevanju na neizpolnjevanje določil dejavnosti. Zato pomeni delovanje endoskopista znotraj določil tudi neizpodbitno pravno zaščito pred nepričakovanim srečanjem z zastopniki zakonodaje. Zaključki. V prispevku je endoskopska dejavnost predstavljena v vidika pravil zdravstvene dejavnosti in strokovnih določil. Namenjen je endoskopistom in vsem ostalim zdravnikom, ki razmišljajo o načinu izvajanja strokovne dejavnosti s čim manjšim številom zapletov in o preprečevanju morebitnih nesoglasij ali formalnih sporov, ki izhajajo iz nezadovoljstva v postopku zdravljenja.

Keywords

No keyword data available

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.21 - Polemic, Discussion
Organization: UM - University of Maribor
UDC: 616.3
COBISS: 2038591 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1318-0347
Parent publication: Zdravniški vestnik
Views: 455
Downloads: 27
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: Background. Discussion of risk management may seem trivial to physician in the day-to-day activities of practice. Most physician recognize the benefits of being proactive in trying to minimize the risks of malpractice litigation through careful documentation, informed consent and adhering to accepting many other areas of risk. The standard of care is a legal concept within professional guidelines describing the duty that physician endoscopists fulfill in their care of a patient. The endoscopist's legal duty is to practice within the reasonable standard of care. A failure to practice within the standard constitutes a "breach of duty", which is one of the elements of proof that a plaintiff must satisfy to win a malpractice claim. Practicing within the standard is the endoscopist's ultimate legal defense. Unrequested interaction between practitioners of the legal and medical fields is not usually the one anticipated with great pleasure by people at all. Conclusions.This article considers endoscopists' practice from the legal point of view concepts and provide a better understanding how the standards and guidelines in gastrointestinal endoscopy reflect clinical practice. It is also meant for endoscopists and any other physicians who are interested in reviewing their practices for potentially litigious situations and in discussion how to optimize their protection againts a successful judgement.
Secondary keywords: Endoscopy, gastrointestinal;Endoskopija, gastrointestinalna;Risk management;Vrednotenje tveganja;Jurisprudence;Pravo;Informed consent;Zavestna privolitev;Communication;Komunikacija;
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS): Not categorized
Pages: str. 449-452
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ74
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ7-8
Chronology: 2005
ID: 9091450