Regulacija in percepcija sovražnega govora

analiza dokumentov in odnosa urednikov spletnih portalov

Abstract

Članek predstavlja problem ustreznega poznavanja regulacijskega in samoregulacijskega okvira sovražnega govora v slovenskih medijih, in sicer na primeru urednikov spletnih medijev kot odbirateljev. Uporabljeni sta dve metodi, in sicer analiza ključnih dokumentov in poglobljeni polstrukturirani intervjuji z izbranimi uredniki slovenskih množičnih medijev. Ugotovitve analize kažejo, da določeni uredniki ne ločujejo med sovražnim govorom in razžalitvami ali kletvicami, kar kaže na slabo poznavanje pravnega okvira, pa tudi samega pojma sovražni govor. Analiza tudi kaže, da to lahko vodi v specifične odločitve urednikov in da so s tem odločitve o sovražnem govoru pogosto prepuščene individualni percepciji urednika

Keywords

Novinarstvo;Sovražni govor;Regulacija;Spletni portali;Analiza vsebine;Slovenija;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2012
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher:	Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani
UDC:	070
COBISS:	31097437
ISSN:	0040-3598
Parent publication:	Teorija in praksa
Views:	967
Downloads:	128
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The article analyses the way hate speech is interpreted by editors as key gatekeepers and definers of the editorial policy of certain media. Related to this is the question of how hate speech is defined in regulatory and self-regulatory terms and documents. The analysis is based on two methods: first an analysis of key documents that form the framework of Slovenian media and, second, in-depth interviews with editors of selected Slovenian (online) media. We found that certain editors do not differentiate between hate speech and defamatory speech and other forms of controversial or banned speech. These perceptions reveal a lack of knowledge regarding the legal framework of hate speech. The analysis also shows that editors of Slovenian online media donot have a precise regulatory and self-regulatory system and thus many decisions regarding hate speech are arbitrary
Secondary keywords:	Journalism;Hate speech;Regulation;Web portals;Content analysis (Communication);Slovenia;
URN:	URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 112-130, 232
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ49
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ1
Chronology:	jan.-feb. 2012
ID:	9096102