o idealizaciji homogenosti diskurzov v čezmejni javni sferi
Abstract
Članek obravnava popularne zahteve po večjem dostopu zamejcev in predstavitvi njihovih interesov v medijih v Republiki Sloveniji (RS), s čimer se po mnenju avtorja nekritično idealizira homogenost diskurzov različnih medijev in publik. (Ne)homogenost je konceptualizirana z gledišča funkcionalističnih in na drugi strani kritičnih diskurzivnih teorij javnosti, kjer slednje - za razliko od prvih - ne vidijo pogoja za integrirano javno sfero v prekrivajočih se diskurzivnih okvirih, temveč v odpravi družbenoekonomskih neenakosti javnih akterjev in v povečani pluralnosti medijev. Rezultati kvantitativne analize prispevkov zamejskih medijev in medijev v RS so pokazali, da se javna razprava oblikuje ob konkretnih zadevah z interpenetracijo diskurzivnih okvirov, ob tem, da javno komuniciranje med zamejstvom in Slovenijo odraža razlike v vplivu in moči med njima, kar mnogo bolje pojasnijo diskurzivne teorije.
Keywords
čezmejna javna sfera;Slovenija;narodne manjšine;zamejski Slovenci;nacionalne manjšine;množični mediji;diskurzi;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2014 |
Typology: |
1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
Organization: |
UP - University of Primorska |
UDC: |
323.15(=163.6):316.77(497.4) |
COBISS: |
1537106116
|
ISSN: |
0354-0286 |
Parent publication: |
Razprave in gradivo
|
Views: |
2904 |
Downloads: |
18 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary abstract: |
The article deals with popular demands for heightening the access of the Slovene national minorities and presentation of their interests in the media in the Republic of Slovenia (RS). Author argues that such demands uncritically idealize homogeneity of discourses of diverse media and publics. (Non)homogenity is conceptualized from the perspective of functionalist and from the critical discursive theories of the public sphere, where the last ones - as opposed to the first ones - do not condition the integrated public sphere by the overlap of discursive frames but by the elimination of socioeconomic inequalities of public actors and by the heightening of the plurality of media. The results of the quantitative analysis of the articles of minorities' media and media in RS show that the public discussion is formed by the interpenetration of discursive frames, whereas the public communication between minorities and Slovenia reflects the uneven distribution of influence and power between them, which can be much better explained by discursive theories. |
Secondary keywords: |
cross-border public sphere;national minorities;media;discourses; |
URN: |
URN:NBN:SI |
Type (COBISS): |
Not categorized |
Pages: |
str. 49-66 |
Issue: |
ǂNo. ǂ73 |
Chronology: |
2014 |
ID: |
9101987 |