Katja Crnogaj (Author), Miroslav Rebernik (Author)

Abstract

Številne raziskave, ki postavljajo podjetništvo v središče proučevanja, še zlasti tiste, ki raziskujejo vpliv podjetništva na gospodarsko rast in razvoj, pogosto ne nudijo dovolj celovite opredelitve in celovitih podjetniških mer za poglobljeno empirično preverjanje. Ker predstavljata merjenje in mednarodna primerjava podjetništva in njegovih rezultatov velik izziv, moramo podjetniške mere skrbno izbrati in interpretirati, da jih je mogoče pravilno upoštevati pri pripravi priporočil oblikovalcem podjetniške politike. V prispevku zato natančneje opredeljujemo najpogosteje uporabljane mere podjetniške aktivnosti na nacionalni ravni, njihove prednosti in slabosti ter morebitna stičišča.

Keywords

podjetje;podjetništvo;aktivnosti;politika podjetja;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.02 - Review Article
Organization: UM EPF - Faculty of Economics and Business
UDC: 005.13:330.341
COBISS: 11594268 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 0547-3101
Parent publication: Naše gospodarstvo
Views: 1208
Downloads: 22
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Critical review of internationally comparable entrepreneurship activity measures
Secondary abstract: Many studies that place entrepreneurship in the centre of their research, especially those exploring the influence of entrepreneurship on economic growth and development, often do not provide definitions and entrepreneurship measures that would be comprehensive enough for an in-depth empirical verification. Because measuring and internationally comparing entrepreneurship and its results are challenging tasks, the entrepreneurship measures must be carefully chosen and interpreted so that they can be appropriately considered when preparing policy-making recommendations. In this paper, we more precisely define the entrepreneurship measures most often used at the national level and identify their strengths and weaknesses as well as possible intersections.
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS): Not categorized
Pages: str. 23-34
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ59
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ5/6
Chronology: 2013
DOI: 10.7549/ourecon.2013.5-6.03
ID: 9102870