Igor Pribac (Author)

Abstract

Članek je kritičen prikaz dveh prevladujočih in nasprotujočih si modelov poslovne etike. Kronološko je najprej nastal delničarski model, ki odgovornost uprav podjetja omejuje na odgovornost do njegovih lastnikov. Ta model je najvplivnejše zasnoval Milton Friedman v članku, objavljenem leta 1970. Kasneje se je izoblikoval deležniški model, ki zagovarja družbeno odgovornost podjetij do različnih notranjih in zunanjih skupin, na katere dobrobit podjetje vpliva s svojim poslovanjem. Obravnava deležniškega modela izpostavi, da z njegovo krepitvijo izginja razlika med državo in podjetjem, obravnava delničarskega modela, vsebovanega v Friedmanovem besedilu, pa poudari, da v nasprotju z mnenjem nekaterih kritikov Friedmanovo stališče ni amoralno.

Keywords

Poslovna etika;Družbena odgovornost podjetja;Delničarji;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UL FF - Faculty of Arts
UDC: 174:330.8
COBISS: 31785821 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 0040-3598
Parent publication: Teorija in praksa
Views: 711
Downloads: 137
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: The article is a critical presentation of two prevailing and colliding models in business ethics. Chronologically the shareholder model arose first and stated that the corporation managers were responsible just towards the owners. Later on a stakeholder model had been formed and claimed that the corporations have certain social responsibilities towards categories of persons inside and outside the corporation whose wellbeing is influenced by its activity. The strengthening of the stakeholder model, as its discussion points out, results in blurring the difference between a state and a corporation. The discussion of the shareholder model through the Friedman's article on the other hand shows that his position could not be judged immoral, as some claim.
Secondary keywords: Business ethics;Social responsibility of business;Stockholders;
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS): Not categorized
Pages: str. 1017-1028, 1043-1044
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ49
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ6
Chronology: nov.-dec. 2012
ID: 9105935