magistrsko delo
Abstract
V magistrskem delu smo z didaktično analizo teoretično in empirično osvetlili predavanje in seminar - v visokošolskem izobraževalnem procesu prevladujoča kontaktna načina oziroma obliki dela profesorjev s študenti. Predstavili smo didaktične značilnosti, funkcije, vloge in vidike teh dveh načinov dela ter njuno načrtovanje, pripravo, izvedbo, analizo in evalvacijo. Poudarili smo pomembnost vseh navedenih faz za njuno kakovost, saj lahko samo kakovostna predavanja in seminarji pri študentih spodbujajo usvajanje znanja, razvijanje kognitivnih sposobnosti in oblikovanje pozitivnih, zaželenih značajskih lastnosti, s čimer dobijo podlago za razvijanje specifičnih in splošnih kompetenc. Z izvedeno anketo na vzorcu 240 rednih študentov dodiplomskega študija smo preučili, kako se ti udeležujejo predavanj in seminarjev, katere značilnosti najpogosteje zaznavajo, kakšna pričakovanja imajo in kako se jim uresničijo. Pri tem nas je zanimal obstoj razlik glede na vrsto fakultete, na kateri študirajo, letnik študija, v katerega so vpisani, in njihovo uspešnost pri študiju. Rezultati kažejo, da se študenti seminarjev in sploh predavanj udeležujejo kar redno in da visoko ocenjujejo njihovo kakovost, so pa pri tem določene statistično značilne razlike glede na vrsto fakultete in uspešnost. Od predavanja in v glavnem tudi od seminarja imajo visoka pričakovanja, ki pa se jim nekoliko manj uresničijo. Menimo, da so možnosti za izboljšanje uresničitve njihovih pričakovanj predvsem v razvijanju in izboljševanju didaktičnih in metodičnih kompetenc profesorjev ter izboljševanju intelektualne in socialne didaktične komunikacije in interakcije med profesorji in študenti.
Keywords
kontaktni načini dela;predavanja;seminarji;pričakovanja študentov;kakovost visokošolskega izobraževanja;magistrska dela;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2016 |
Typology: |
2.09 - Master's Thesis |
Organization: |
UM FF - Faculty of Arts |
Publisher: |
[S. Kukovec] |
UDC: |
378.141.091.32:005.336.3(043.2) |
COBISS: |
22467848
|
Views: |
953 |
Downloads: |
96 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
Didactic analysis of contact courses in educational process in higher education |
Secondary abstract: |
Our thesis employs didactic analysis to theoretically and empirically examine lecture and seminar, two predominant forms of contact courses in higher education where professors work with students. We present their didactic features, functions, roles and aspects, including their planning, preparation, execution, analysis and evaluation. We stress the importance of all listed stages for their quality, since only high-quality lectures and seminars promote the acquisition of knowledge among students, develop their cognitive skills and form positive, desirable personality traits, which then give the basis for the development of students' specific and general competencies. We conducted a survey on a sample of 240 full-time undergraduate students to examine their lecture and seminar attendance, their expectations and their realisation. We examined the differences according to faculty type, students' year of study and educational performance. The results show that students attend lectures and seminars relatively regularly and that they rate their quality as high, with some statistically significant differences according to faculty type and educational performance. Students express high expectations of lectures and also of seminars, but these are somewhat less realised. We suggest the possibilities for the realisation of their expectations lie especially in developing and improving teachers' didactic and methodical competencies and in improving intellectual and social didactic communication and interaction between teachers and students. |
Secondary keywords: |
contact courses;lectures;seminars;students' expectations;quality of higher education;master theses; |
URN: |
URN:SI:UM: |
Type (COBISS): |
Master's thesis |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Mariboru, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za pedagogiko |
Pages: |
II f., 163 str., 84 str. pril. |
ID: |
9156677 |