magistrsko delo
Igor Ivanovski (Author), Jure Marn (Mentor)

Abstract

POVZETEK V magistrskem delu je obravnavana aktualna problematika izkoriščanja geotermalne energije za namene proizvodnje električne energije v povezavi z dognanji stroke varnosti in zanesljivosti. Delo obravnava področje tehničnih in človeških napak, katerih posledica so lahko nepredvideni dogodki. Za procesno enoto sem izbral geotermalno elektrarno za katero je bila preizkušena kvantitativna metoda določitve verjetnosti tehnične in človeške napake. Določitev tehnične napake je bila izvedena z metodo analize drevesa odpovedi, medtem ko je bila verjetnost človeške napake ovrednotena z osnovno in razširjeno metodo CREAM (Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method). V zaključku naloge je narejena sinteza tehnične in človeške napake.

Keywords

varnost;zanesljivost;tehnična napaka;človeška napaka;drevo odpovedi;kognitivna zanesljivost;magistrske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Publisher: [I. Ivanovski]
UDC: 621.577.2:006.88(043.2)
COBISS: 20180502 Link will open in a new window
Views: 853
Downloads: 28
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: SAFETY AND RELIABILITY OF GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANTS
Secondary abstract: ABSTRACT The thesis deals with current problems of exploitation of geothermal energy for the production of electricity in conjunction with the findings of the profession of safety and reliability. The aim of this work is the field of technical failures and human errors, which may result in unforeseen events. The work deals with the field of technical and human errors, which may result in unforeseen events. For the processing unit I chose a geothermal power plant, for which the quantitative method of determining the likelihood of technical failure and human error has been tested. Determination of a technical failure was made by the method of fault tree analysis, while the likelihood of a human error was evaluated by the basic and extended CREAM method (Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method). The synthesis of technical failure and human error was made in the conclusion.
Secondary keywords: safety;reliability;technical failure;human error;fault tree;cognitive reliability;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 2019-09-05
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za strojništvo
Pages: IX, 92 f.
ID: 9157161