Andreja Vezovnik (Author)

Abstract

Prispevek analizira argumente "za" in "proti", ki so se pojavili v postopku deliberacije o predlogu besedila Družinskega zakonika, ki ga je leta 2009 v razpravo dala predlagateljica - Vlada Republike Slovenije. S pomočjo kvalitativne analize argumentov in analize diskurza prispevek analizira prepise razprav, ki so potekale v letih 2010 in 2011 v Državnem zboru, Državnem svetu in na Odboru za delo, družino, socialne zadeve in invalide. Prispevek razdela strukture predstavljenih argumentov in njihove argumentacijskie sheme. Prispevek se konča z vsebinsko razpravo, ki povezuje teorijo argumentacije s teorijo diskurza in skuša pokazati, da je bil DZak zavrnjen na podlagi argumentov, zasidranih v esencialističnem pojmovanju spola, spolne usmerjenosti, družine in nacije.

Keywords

politični argumenti;politični diskurz;družine;zakonske zveze;istospolni partnerji;pravica do posvojitve;2010-2011;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
UDC: 303.022:347.61/.64(497.4)
COBISS: 584447 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 0040-3598
Parent publication: Teorija in praksa
Views: 925
Downloads: 259
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: The article analyses the "pro" and "contra" arguments which appeared in the process of deliberating the proposed Family Act initiated by the Government of the Republic of Slovenia in 2009. A qualitative analysis is made of arguments and discourse analysis of transcripts of conversations which took place in 2010 and 2011 in the National Assembly, the National Council, and the Committee for Labour, Family, Social Affairs and the Disabled. The structure of the arguments and the related argumentation schemes are outlined. The article concludes with a substantive debate which connects discourse theory with argumentation theory and claims the draft Family Act was rejected with arguments anchored in essentialist conceptions of gender, sexual orientation, family and nation.
Secondary keywords: Družinsko pravo;Family law;Parlamentarna razprava;Parliamentary debate;Slovenija;Slovenia;Kvalitativna analiza;Qualitative analysis;
Type (COBISS): Not categorized
Pages: str. 1191-1211, 1248
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ52
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ6
Chronology: nov.-dec. 2015
ID: 9168371