Spoštljivost v deliberaciji

konceptualni premisleki, alternativna operacionalizacija in empirična validacija

Gregor Petrič (Author), Sara Atanasova (Author)

Abstract

Spoštljivost komuniciranja je eden ključnih kriterijev kvalitetne deliberacije, hkrati pa tudi najbolj nejasen in problematično merjen pojem na področju raziskovanja deliberacije. Osrednji namen članka je predstaviti konceptualno-teoretične izzive pri poskusu natančnejše opredelitve pojma spoštljivosti, ki nato služijo kot prizma za evalvacijo veljavnosti obstoječih načinov merjenja spoštljivosti v deliberaciji. Na podlagi razprave o spoštljivosti kot dejavniku, ki vpliva na ostale komponente deliberacije, je osnovana hipoteza, ki služi preverjanju kriterijske veljavnosti. V empiričnem delu je na osnovi razprav o Družinskem zakoniku z uporabo logistične regresije ugotovljena šibka kriterijska veljavnost alternativnega merskega inštrumenta, ki pa odpira možnosti za nadaljnjo optimizacijo.

Keywords

družinski zakoniki;Posvetovalna demokracija;Družinsko pravo;Spoštovanje;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2015
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
UDC:	321.011:347.61/.64
COBISS:	33787229
ISSN:	0040-3598
Parent publication:	Teorija in praksa
Views:	774
Downloads:	201
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	Respect in communication is one of the key criteria for good deliberation, yet it is one of the unclearest concepts in the field of deliberation research with many critical issues in approaches to its measurement. The main purpose of the article is to present theoretical challenges in an attempt to produce a clearer definition of respect in deliberation, which then serves as a criterion to evaluate the validity of existing approaches to measuring respect in deliberation. On the basis of understanding respect as a factor influencing other components of deliberation, a hypothesis is formed which serves to analyse the criterion%s validity. When applying a logistic regression on a sample of discussions on the Family Act, the weak criterion validity of the alternative measurement instrument was found. However, this warrants further optimisation of the measurement instrument.
Secondary keywords:	Deliberative democracy;Family law;Respect;
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 1143-1166, 1247
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ52
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ6
Chronology:	nov.-dec. 2015
ID:	9169677