Abstract
Članek v ospredje postavlja idejo aktivističnega državljana in sooča teorije, ki novo informacijsko in komunikacijsko tehnologijo postavljajo kot vzvod za demokratizacijo elektronske javne sfere, s teorijami, ki opozarjajo na različno sposobnost množičnih ali osebnih medijev pri generiranju političnega vpliva. Razlike so osvetljene na treh področjih družbenega sistema komuniciranja - na infrastrukturi, distribucijskih servisih ter na vsebinah in komunikacijskih servisih. Teza je, da avtorji, ki v razvoju IKT vidijo izhod iz hierarhično vodene produkcije sporočil, ne upoštevajo kontradiktornega odnosa med interesi korporativnih lastnikov in končnih uporabnikov. Avtor ugotavlja, da je amaterska produkcija tematsko dokaj razpršena, obenem pa prevzema del stroškov dela in opreme, tako da jo današnja konstelacija političnih in ekonomskih sil brez nevarnosti, da bi bila sposobna generirati večjo količino političnega vpliva, mnogokrat močno stimulira.
Keywords
državljanstvo;javna sfera;mediji;produkcija;distribucija;informacijska ekonomija;tehnologija;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2014 |
Typology: |
1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
Organization: |
UP - University of Primorska |
UDC: |
342.71:316.77 |
COBISS: |
1537077700
|
ISSN: |
0040-3598 |
Parent publication: |
Teorija in praksa
|
Views: |
2615 |
Downloads: |
82 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary abstract: |
The article brings the idea of the activist citizen to the forefront, and confronts theories which conceptualise new information and communication technology as a lever for democratisation of the electronic public sphere with theories that accentuate the varying ability of the mass media and personal media to generate political influence. Differences are highlighted on the three layers of the social communication system that consists of infrastructure, distribution services, and content and communication services. The thesis is that those authors who see the development of technology as a relief from the hierarchically-driven production of information do not take the contradictory relationships between the interests of corporate owners and user-consumers into consideration. The author claims that amateur production is thematically fragmented and is taking over part of the labour and equipment costs. Such a form of production is frequently encouraged by political and economic elites without the danger of it being able to generate a considerable amount of political influence. |
Secondary keywords: |
citizenship;public sphere;media;production;distribution;information economy;technology; |
URN: |
URN:NBN:SI |
Type (COBISS): |
Not categorized |
Pages: |
str. 1204-1221, 1406-1407 |
Volume: |
ǂLetn. ǂ51 |
Issue: |
ǂšt. ǂ6 |
Chronology: |
nov.-dec. 2014 |
ID: |
9169748 |