magistrsko diplomsko delo
Petra Razpet (Author), Mirjam Škrk (Mentor)

Abstract

V svojem magistrskem diplomskem delu se bom osredotočila na problematiko pravil, ki urejajo razmejitev in določitev meje epikontinentalnega pasu. V veljavnih konvencijah lahko najdemo zelo malo število določb, ki urejajo pomorsko razmejitev, ki pa zaradi svoje ohlapnosti in nedoločnosti omogočajo veliko prostora za različne interpretacije. Temeljno pravilo predvideva določitev morskih meja s sporazumom med državami. Subsidiarno se pri razmejitvi teritorialnega morja uporabi metoda ekvidistance, razen če posebne okoliščine ali obstoj zgodovinskega naslova ne upravičujejo drugačnega poteka meje. Razmejitev epikontinentalnega pasu in izključne ekonomske cone se ureja s sporazumom na podlagi mednarodnega prava z namenom doseči pravično rešitev. Glede na to, da konvencije ne opredeljujejo pojmov, kot so pravična rešitev, posebne okoliščine in zgodovinski naslov, je izjemen pomen judikature Meddržavnega sodišča v Haagu. Skozi prizmo omenjene judikature želim prikazati, kako so se pravila za razmejitev epikontinentalnega pasu oblikovala in razjasnjevala. V tem okviru bom analizirala dejavnike in njihovo vlogo pri določanju meja s posebnim poudarkom na njihovem pomenu, ki jim ga priznava Meddržavno sodišče.

Keywords

mednarodno pravo;Meddržavno sodišče;sodbe;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [P. Razpet]
UDC: 341:347.9(043.2)
COBISS: 15371089 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1875
Downloads: 564
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The delimitation of continental shelf through the prism of judgements of the International Court of Justice
Secondary abstract: In my Master thesis, I shall focus on the issue of rules, which determine delimitation and border demarcation of the continental shelf. The existing conventions reveal only a small number of provisions defining maritime delimitation, which due to its looseness and vagueness enable ample room for different interpretations. The basic rule predicts the determination of maritime boarders by agreement between the countries. In delimitation of the territorial sea, the method of equidistance is used for support, unless special circumstances or the existence of a historic title do not justify a different course of the border. Delimitation of continental shelf and exclusive economic zones are nevertheless determined by agreement on the basis of international law with the purpose of attaining an equitable solution. Due to the fact that conventions do not define concepts such as equitable solution, special circumstances and historic title, the case law of the International Court of Justice in the Hague is of the utmost importance. Through the prism of the aforementioned case law, I would like to present how rules for delimitation of the continental shelf were created and clarified. Within this framework, I shall analyse the factors and their role in determining boarders, with special emphasis on their meaning, recognized by the International Court of Justice.
Secondary keywords: delimitation;continental shelf;case law;International Court of Justice;equidistance;equity;relevant circumstances;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 53 f.
ID: 9248982