magistrska naloga
Marko Huskić (Author), Damjan Korošec (Mentor)

Abstract

Posredno storilstvo z uporabo organiziranega aparata moči je način utemeljitve krivde storilcev kaznivih dejanj »za pisarniško mizo«. Po tradicionalni delitvi na storilce in udeleţence so voditelji kriminalnih organizacij, ki ne sodelujejo neposredno pri izvršitvi kaznivega dejanja, zgolj napeljevalci ali pomočniki, v tem institutu pa voditelj, ki ima aparat z velikim številom zamenljivih neposrednih storilcev, de facto nadzoruje kaznivo dejanje in je zato pravilno, da odgovarja kot (posredni) storilec. V prispevku avtor predstavi institut, prikaţe njegovo uporabo na konkretnih zadevah pred sodišči v Nemčiji, Argentini, Peruju, Kolumbiji, Čilu in pred Mednarodnim kazenskim sodiščem v Haagu in se opredeli do pomislekov zoper uporabo instituta. Na koncu še razišče, če ima institut prostor tudi v slovenskem kazenskem pravu.

Keywords

posredno storilstvo;organiziran aparat moči;hudodelska združba;storilci;vojna hudodelstva;individualna odgovornost;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [M. Huskić]
UDC: 343(043.2)
COBISS: 15530577 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1093
Downloads: 321
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Criminal liability and indirect perpetration through organised structures of power
Secondary abstract: Indirect perpetration through organised structures of power (Organisationsherrschaft) is a mode of liability used to convict perpetrators who commit crimes while “sitting at their desk”. According to traditional modes of liability, the leader of an organization, who does not directly participate in a commission of a crime, could only be held liable as an instigator or an abettor, which is generally considered inaccurate in respect to his actual contribution. This theory proves that a leader of an organization exercises effective control over the commission of the crime through the apparatus when physical perpetrators are interchangeable at will and have no ability to influence whether the crime will be committed, even though they can fully choose whether they will participate in it. The author starts by introducing the theory in depth, demonstrates its use in cases before courts in Germany, Argentina, Peru, Colombia, Chile and International Criminal Court in The Hague and considers some of the most common critiques and responds to them. In the end, the author evaluates whether Slovenian Penal code offers basis for the use of this form of indirect perpetration.
Secondary keywords: Indirect perpetration;organised power structures;individual liability;war crimes;perpetrator;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 36 f.
ID: 9593471