(magistrsko delo)
Mateja Ule (Author), Peter Grilc (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrska naloga obravnava izbrana vprašanja dodeljevanja odškodnin na podlagi Dunajske konvencije ter pri tem izpostavi prednosti, pa tudi omejitve Dunajske konvencije. Gre za vprašanje možnosti povrnitve procesnih stroškov preko odškodnine dodeljene na podlagi konvencije, možnosti upoštevanja protipravno pridobljenega dobička pri določanju odškodnine oškodovane stranke ter vprašanje ekonomske nemožnosti izpolnitve pogodbe kot razloga za oprostitev odškodninske odgovornosti stranke. Pri presoji vprašanja povrnitve procesnih stroškov je ključno dejstvo, da bi povrnitev procesnih stroškov pripeljala do položaja neenakosti med strankama, saj bi bila taka povrnitev mogoča le za stranko, ki je kršila pogodbo, ne pa za stranko, ki je le neutemeljeno pričela s postopkom, v katerem so nastali procesni stroški. Taka rešitev je v nasprotju s temeljnim postulatom enakosti med strankama, zato menim, da ni sprejemljiva. Trend razvoja v nacionalnih pravih čedalje bolj razširjeno omogoča odvzem protipravno pridobljenega dobička. Če se Dunajska konvencija ne odzove na aktualne potrebe pogodbenih odnosov tvega, da bo padla v pozabo. V tem smislu je dobrodošlo, da skladno z možnostjo fleksibilnega izračuna odškodnin 74. člen Dunajske konvencije razlagamo na način, ki pri izračunu škode omogoča upoštevanje dobička, ki ga je preko kršitve pogodbe kumulirala pogodbi nezvesta stranka. Podlago za tak izračun škode dajejo izpolnitveni interes pogodbi zveste stranke ter splošna načela, na katerih temelji konvencija. Zadnje obravnavano vprašanje je možnost razbremenitve dolžnika v primeru ekonomske nemožnosti izpolnitve. Razbremenitev je po mojem mnenju mogoča le, kadar gospodarska otežitev predstavlja oviro, ki je primerljiva okoliščinam dejanske nemožnosti, ki opravičujejo razbremenitev odškodninske odgovornosti dolžnika.

Keywords

Konvencija Združenih narodov o pogodbah o mednarodni prodaji blaga;odškodnine;procesni stroški;protipravno pridobljen dobiček;spremenjene okoliščine;razlaga CISG;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [M. Ule]
UDC: 339.1:347(043.2)
COBISS: 15529809 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1659
Downloads: 395
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Selected questions of awarding damages under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
Secondary abstract: The Master thesis addresses selected topics of awarding damages under the CISG and thereby highlights the advantages and also the shortcomings of the Convention. Namely, the questions of awarding litigation costs as damages, the possibility of disgorgement of profits under the CISG and the question of the economic impossibility of performance of the contract as grounds for exemption from liability of the party are adressed. When considering the question of litigation costs it is cruical that such recovery would lead to unequal treatment of the parties since such recovery would only be available to the party who has breached the contract but not to the party who initiated the unsubstantiated proceedings. This approach goes contrary to the basic postulates of equality between the parties and is therefore not admissible in my opinion. In the national laws of the contracting states the acceptance of the possibility of disgorgement of profits is increasing. Should the CISG neglect the current needs of contractual relations it is under the risk of falling into oblivion. It is therefore neccessary and in accordance with the possibility of flexible calculation of damages to intepret the CISG in a way as to allow a consideration of the profits made by the breaching party as a result of the breach. The basis for such calculation is the performance interest of the non-breaching party and the principles underlying the Convention. The final topic adressed in the Master thesis is the possibility of exemption of liability in the case of economic impossibility of performance. The exemption can in my opinion only be upheld where the economic difficulty constitutes an obstacle comparable to the factual impossibility which justifies the relief of liability of the debtor.
Secondary keywords: The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods;damages;litigation costs;disgorgement of profits;changed circumstances;interpretation of the CISG.;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 35 f.
ID: 9593832