Manja Kitek Kuzman (Avtor), Petra Grošelj (Avtor), Nadir Ayrilmis (Avtor), Martina Zbašnik-Senegačnik (Avtor)

Povzetek

In this study, in order to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the most common construction materials, different constructions types for passive houses, such as solid wood, wood-frame, aerated concrete, and brick, were compared with each other. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a widely used multi-criteria method, was applied to quantify the comparison. The analysis of different construction types based on quantifying different criteria for passive houses was performed on a case study. The AHP analysis revealed that the highest-ranking criteria came into play here, notably well-being, the psychological aspect, and functionality in the wood construction considered as one of the most suitable options for passive houses. The AHP analysis can help professionals and future dwellers to make a reasonable choice on further optimizing and developing a particular aspect of the building process by giving them the possibility of comparing different alternatives on a common and comprehensive basis. In the light of the growing importance of energy-efficient building methods, it could be said that wood construction would play an increasingly important role in the future.

Ključne besede

passive house;building criteria;analytic hierarchy process;design tool;construction;

Podatki

Jezik: Angleški jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija: UL FA - Fakulteta za arhitekturo
UDK: 728.37:662.99
COBISS: 2108297 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
ISSN: 0378-7788
Št. ogledov: 1376
Št. prenosov: 445
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarne ključne besede: pasivna hiša;kriteriji gradnje;AHP metoda;orodje za oblikovanje;konstrukcije;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Delo ni kategorizirano
Strani: str. 258-263
Letnik: ǂVol. ǂ64
Zvezek: sept.
Čas izdaje: 2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.020
ID: 1033453