finding an interface
Petra Hietanen-Kunwald (Avtor), Rikka Koulu (Avtor), Santtu Turunen (Avtor)

Povzetek

As the revision process of Brussels I Regime has focused on the abolition of exequatur procedures, the interface between the Regulation and arbitration has been mostly a side note. Regardless of the fact that the systems of the Brussels I Regime and arbitration are two separate autonomous systems, overlapping issues arise. These interfaces have been discussed in the case-law of ECJ and later during the revision process. In the end, recitals elaborating the interface were added to the preamble of the Regulation, but no changes to the arbitration exclusion were introduced. The recital 12 aims to clarify how the arbitration exclusion adopted in the Regulation should be interpreted in the future. However, future case-law of ECJ is elemental to define the full meaning of the recitals.

Ključne besede

odločanje;pravdni postopek;sodni postopek;nepravdni postopek;arbitraža;Evropska unija;

Podatki

Jezik: Angleški jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija: UM PF - Pravna fakulteta
UDK: 347.9:061.1EU
COBISS: 291224064 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
ISSN: 1855-7147
Matična publikacija: Lexonomica
Št. ogledov: 575
Št. prenosov: 78
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Slovenski jezik
Sekundarne ključne besede: odločanje;pravdni postopek;sodni postopek;nepravdni postopek;arbitraža;Evropska unija;uredba Bruselj I;Newyorška konvencija;
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Znanstveno delo
Strani: str. 93-114
Letnik: ǂVol. ǂ8
Zvezek: ǂno. ǂ2
Čas izdaje: dec. 2016
ID: 10950060