diplomsko delo
Alja Klara Ugovšek (Avtor), Aljoša Dežman (Mentor)

Povzetek

Raziskovalno delo v osrednjem delu prinaša na enem mestu popis pravic invalidov in kronično bolnih oseb na sedmih kompleksnih področjih. Pri obravnavi pravic sem se omejila zgolj na tiste pravice, do katerih so oziroma bi bili upravičeni bolniki s cistično fibrozo in njihovi starši. Popis omogoča vpogled v osnovne podatke o pravicah, ne more pa biti podlaga za uresničevanje pravic, ker ne nudi vedno vseh podrobnih podatkov o posamezni pravici, ki je z vidika uveljavljanja pravic odločilnega pomena. Ker je na področju pravic invalidov v Sloveniji veliko različne zakonodaje, ki je razpršena v posameznih predpisih in se intenzivno spreminja, sem upoštevala vse ustrezne dopolnitve in spremembe. Po preučitvi celotne zakonodaje na različnih področjih ugotavljam, da zakonodaja za nekatere pravice ne določa upravičenosti glede na oviranost ali starost upravičenca, ampak upošteva druge kriterije. Pogosto so kriterij delež telesne okvare, vključenost v zavarovanje in čas oziroma obdobje nastanka invalidnosti. Do velikega dela pravic so upravičene vse skupine invalidov, ne glede na pridobljen status invalida po različnih predpisih, do nekaterih pravic pa so upravičene tudi druge osebe. Ker posamezni predpisi na področju pravic invalidov različno poimenujejo skupine upravičencev, so različne tudi ugodnosti za invalide oziroma kronično bolne osebe. V večini zakonodaje na področju socialnega varstva, zaposlovanja in invalidskega zavarovanja je za upravičenost do posamezne pravice določen kriterij invalidnost ali delež telesne okvare. To predstavlja veliko težavo za bolnike s cistično fibrozo po končanem šolanju, saj niso več upravičeni do družinskih prejemkov, statusa invalida pa tudi ne pridobijo. Po novi invalidski zakonodaji, ki jo je v letu 2013 prinesel ZPIZ-2, so do pravice do invalidnine upravičeni le še zavarovanci, pri katerih je telesna okvara nastala kot posledica poškodbe pri delu ali poklicne bolezni in ne več tudi zaradi bolezni ali poškodbe izven dela. Invalidnina je denarna mesečna renta, namenjena nadomestitvi zavarovančeve izgube, bistvenejše poškodovanosti ali znatnejše onesposobljenosti posameznih organov ali delov telesa, kar otežuje aktivnost organizma in zahteva večje napore pri zadovoljevanju življenjskih potreb, ne glede na to, ali ta okvara povzroča invalidnost ali ne. Čeprav je zakonodajalec v ZPIZ-2 določil, da v roku dveh let po uveljavitvi tega zakona sprejme nov seznam telesnih okvar, se za določitev vrste in stopnje telesnih okvar še vedno uporablja zastareli Samoupravni sporazum o seznamu telesnih okvar iz leta 1983. Na področju telesnih okvar je sedaj prisotna pravna praznina, ker zakonodajalec tega področja na novo še ni uredil.

Ključne besede

človekove pravice;invalidi;bolniki;cistična fibroza;diplomske naloge;bolonjski program;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.11 - Diplomsko delo
Organizacija: EVRO-PF - Evropska pravna fakulteta v Novi Gorici
Založnik: [A. K. Ugovšek]
UDK: 342.7:616-052(043.2)
COBISS: 2053186486 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 2
Št. prenosov: 0
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni povzetek: Research work in the central part brings in one place a list of the rights of people with disabilities and chronically ill people, in seven complex areas. When dealing with rights, I restricted myself only to those that were or would be eligible for patients with cystic fibrosis and their parents. The census provides insight into the basic rights data, but cannot be the basis for the exercise of rights, since it does not always provide all the detailed information on a particular right that is decisive in the exercise of rights. As there are many different types of legislation in the domain of rights of people with disabilities in Slovenia, scattered throughout individual regulations and changing intensively, I have taken into account all the relevant amendments and changes. After examining the whole legislation in various fields, I find that the legislation for certain rights does not provide eligibility in relation to the disadvantage or age of the beneficiary, but takes into account some other criteria. Often, the criteria are the proportion of physical impairment, inclusion in insurance, the time or period of the occurrence of disability. All groups of people with disabilities are entitled to a large share of their rights, irrespective of the status of a disabled person under different regulations, whilst some rights apply to other individuals, as well. Since individual regulations in the area of rights of people with disabilities are differentiated by groups of beneficiaries, there are also different benefits for people with disabilities or chronically ill people. In the majority of legislation, in the field of social protection, employment and disability insurance, the criterion of disability or the proportion of physical impairment is defined in order to filter out the individuals entitled to certain rights. This is a major problem for patients with cystic fibrosis after completing schooling, as they are no longer entitled to family benefits and do not acquire the status of a disabled person. Under the new disability legislation, which was brought about by ZPIZ-2 in 2013, the disability benefits are now restricted to those policyholders whose disability occurred as a result of a worksite injury or an occupational disease and not due to a disease or an injury outside of work. Disability allowance is a monthly cash annuity, intended to offset the losses of the insured due to a substantial injury or a substantial incapacity of individual organs or body parts, hindering the activity of the organism and requiring greater effort in satisfying the basic human needs, irrespective of the effect of the impairment on the disability. Although the legislature ZPIZ 2 states that within two years of its enactment, the act should adopt a new list of injuries to determine the nature and degree of injuries, it still uses the outdated self-management agreement list of injuries from 1983. Thus, there is a legal loophole in the domain of injuries, since the legislature has not yet regulated the area.
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Diplomsko delo/naloga
Komentar na gradivo: Evropska pravna fak.
Komentar vira: Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija; univerzitetni študijski program Pravo I;
Strani: VII, 75 str.
ID: 10951847