Raziskovalno delo sodelavcev in analiza diplomskih, specialističnih in magistrskih nalog Fakultete za varnostne vede Univerze v Mariboru v obdobju 2005-2010

Barbara Čuvan (Avtor), Boštjan Slak (Avtor), Gorazd Meško (Avtor), Sanja Gorza-Luk (Avtor)

Povzetek

Namen prispevka: Namen prispevka je prikazati rezultate analize raziskovalnih del sodelavcev in zaključnih del študentov na Fakulteti za varnostne vede. Prispevek kaže tudi povezavo med raziskovalnim delom predavateljev in zaključnimi deli študentov. Obe analizi sta bili narejeni za obdobje 2005–2010, služita pa tudi za okvirno primerjavo s predhodno analizo raziskovalnih in zaključnih del v obdobju 1996– 2005. Metodologija: Podatki o objavah zaposlenih na Fakulteti za varnostne vede so bili pridobljeni s portala SICRIS. Opravljen je bil pregled in analiza 1262 zaključnih del (diplomskih, specialističnih in magistrskih nalog) v obdobju 2005– 2010. Pridobljeni podatki so bili analizirani z opisno statistično metodo. Ugotovitve: Primerjava obremenjenosti zaposlenih na fakulteti kaže, da se v zadnjih 15. letih med najbolj aktivnimi mentorji in raziskovalci pojavljajo isti sodelavci fakultete. Moč je opaziti velik napredek v številu raziskovalnih del objavljenih v publikacijah s faktorjem vpliva (SSCI, WoS). Število raziskovalnih in zaključnih del na Fakulteti za varnostne vede se je v obdobju 2005–2010 v primerjavi z obdobjem 1996–2005 pomembno povečalo. Število diplomskih, specialističnih in magistrskih del se je podvojilo, pri čemer primerjava o izbiri pristopa k pisanju zaključnega dela kaže, da ostaja primaren teoretičen pristop oz. pregled literature. Izbira ustreznih ključnih besed, pravilno citiranje in poimenovanje uporabljenih metod predstavljajo področja, ki zahtevajo izboljšavo. Omejitve/uporabnost raziskave: Uporabljena je bila samo metoda opisne statistike, ki sicer prinese informativne rezultate, ti pa imajo omejeno vrednost. Potrebna bi bila podrobnejša kvalitativna analiza raziskovalnih in zaključnih del. Praktična uporabnost: Povečuje se število zaključnih del študentov, kar ustvarja potrebo po letnih analizah. Potrebne informacije za analize bi se lahko zbirale v knjižnici Fakultete za varnostne vede, ko bi se vnašalo zaključno delo v sistem COBISS. S tem bi se prihranilo na času in omogočilo takojšno zaznavo nepravilnosti. Druga možnost bi bila, da referat za študijske zadeve ob oddaji in pred zagovorom zaključnega dela pregleda vsako zaključno delo, če ta izpolnjuje vse zahteve v smislu sloga in ustreznosti formata. Mentorji potrebujejo dodatna izobraževanja za izvajanje kakovostnega mentorstva. Izvirnost/pomembnost prispevka: Tako analiza zaključnih del, kot analiza raziskovalnih del predstavljata izvirni prispevek. Analiza raziskovalnih del nam služi za analizo in za usmeritve o nadaljnjih raziskovalnih projektih, medtem ko je analiza zaključnih del primarno namenjena mentorjem in tistim, ki oblikujejo pravilnike in navodila za pisanje zaključnih del na različnih stopnjah študija na Fakulteti za varnostne vede. Rezultati analize raziskovalnih del imajo tudi vrednost za širšo javnost, saj nakazujejo trenutne varnostne trende in raziskovalne interese Fakultete za varnostne vede.

Ključne besede

diplomska dela;specialistična dela;magistrska dela;raziskovalno delo;Fakulteta za varnostne vede;FVV;analize;

Podatki

Jezik:	Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:	2010
Tipologija:	1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:	UM FVV - Fakulteta za varnostne vede
UDK:	001.8
COBISS:	1988074
ISSN:	1580-0253
Matična publikacija:	Varstvoslovje
Št. ogledov:	1590
Št. prenosov:	64
Ocena:	0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki:

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik:	Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov:	The Research Work of Faculty Members and Analysis of Bachelor’s, Specialist’s and Master’s Thesis at the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, University of Maribor, during 2005-2010
Sekundarni povzetek:	Purpose: The primary purpose is to present the results of evaluations of the research staff of the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, and to summarize the results of evaluations of bachelor’s, specialist’s and master’s thesis in the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security. Additionally, our purpose was to find a causal link between the two types of work. Both evaluations are implemented for the period 2005-2010 and serve as a comparison to previous evaluations (for 1996-2005). They also set out certain guidelines for the future. Design/Methodology/Approach: The analysis data of publications by those employed at the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security were obtained from the SICRIS portal. A review and analysis was conducted on 1262 bachelor’s, specialist’s and master’s thesis in the period 2005-2010. This review included searching and examining those characteristics that were later used for frequency count analysis and the comparison and the interpretation of interactions arisen between them. There was also a review conducted of published research papers the faculty´s colleagues. The statistical procedure used a descriptive statistical method. Findings: The number of research works and final theses at the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security significantly increased between 2005 and 2010 when compared to the period 1996-2005. The most progress was made in regard the number of research papers that were published in scientific journals of international scientific importance. Research topics are very diverse. The quantity of theses is almost equivalent to the previous evaluation period, even though this evaluation included only 5 years, while the previous one covers a 10-year period. When comparing the results of both evaluations, we can find out that the same experts were in fact the most occupied mentors. The comparison of empirical and theoretical approaches reveals that the primarily and continued approach remains the theoretical one. The selection of key words, the appropriate way of quoting and the appointment of appropriate used methods remain problematic. Research limitations/implications: It was proven that the number of theses per year in increasing and that is why we believe that it would be reasonable to implement smaller, annual evaluations. Data could be collected at the faculty´s library department simultaneously with input of the thesis into the COBISS system. This would save some time and raise an immediate alert in case of irregularities. Practical implications: The analysis gives information about the most frequent mentors. Furthermore, the analysis of approaches and the (re)exposure of certain style and format problems (the choice of keywords, quoting, etc.) are presented. These findings imply the need for a more suitable and unique guidelines for students and mentors. The applicability of this paper is reflected in the fact that the experts of the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security successfully use research findings on topics of safety, security, criminalities and similar police activities in the Slovenian environment and vice versa. Originality/Value: Both analyses (of research works and of the bachelor’s, specialist’s and master’s thesis) are original. The analysis of research works are applicable for evaluating and planning the future research projects, while the analysis of the thesis is primarily intended for mentors and creators of regulating and educational documents used by students while writing their own thesis. Analysis of research work could be valuable for wider public on account of its capability of showing the most up to date security trends.
Sekundarne ključne besede:	bachelor’s;specialist’s and master’s thesis;analysis;research;Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security;
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Vrsta dela (COBISS):	Znanstveno delo
Strani:	str. 245-279
Letnik:	ǂLetn. ǂ12
Zvezek:	ǂšt. ǂ3
Čas izdaje:	2010
Ključne besede (UDK):	science and knowledge;organization;computer science;information;documentation;librarianship;institutions;publications;znanost in znanje;organizacije;informacije;dokumentacija;bibliotekarstvo;institucije;publikacije;prolegomena;fundamentals of knowledge and culture;propaedeutics;prolegomena;splošne osnove znanosti in kulture;science and knowledge in general;organization of intellectual work;znanost in znanje na splošno;organizacija intelektualnega dela;methodology;znanstvena metodologija;
ID:	11665004