Ljubljanske malefične svoboščine v evropskem kontekstu - ob 500 letnici njihove podelitve

Povzetek

Ključne besede

Podatki

Jezik:	Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:	2017
Tipologija:	1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:	UL PF - Pravna fakulteta
UDK:	34(091):343
COBISS:	15988305
ISSN:	1318-0185
Št. ogledov:	64
Št. prenosov:	27
Ocena:	0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki:

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik:	Italijanski jezik
Sekundarni naslov:	L'ordinanza criminale per la città di Lubiana nel contesto europeo – in occasione del 500° anniversario della loro emanazione
Sekundarni povzetek:	L’ordinanza criminale per la città di Lubiana (Ljubljana) risalente al 1514 è un importante documento giuridico, che assieme alle poche fonti relative alla prassi giudiziaria illustra il periodo in cui iniziarono ad apparire le prime codificazioni del diritto penale. Tenendo presente il contesto delle circostanze e dei fattori sociali di un territorio più ampio, il contributo tratta dell’importanza locale di questo provvedimento e del suo ruolo nello sviluppo del diritto penale europeo dell’età moderna. L’ordinanza criminale rappresenta un esempio dei primi tentativi di consolidare e centralizzare il potere attraverso l’unificazione del diritto dal punto di vista territoriale e di quello del contenuto. In quest’ambito un ruolo fondamentale fu esercitato dalla ricezione del processo romano-canonico. Tra le poche ordinanze criminali risalenti a quel periodo, quella per la città di Lubiana si distingue per il principio dell’officialità, particolarmente accentuato, dell’azione penale contro l’omicidio. Dal punto di vista del suo scopo e del suo contenuto l’ordinanza criminale per la città di Lubiana può essere indubbiamente considerata una precorritrice della Constitutio Criminalis Carolina.
Sekundarne ključne besede:	criminal law;inquisitorial procedure;principle of officiality;reception of Roman law;Constitutio Criminalis Carolina;centralisation of power;public order;revenge;
Vrsta dela (COBISS):	Članek v reviji
Komentar vira:	TITLE: Criminal Justice Freedoms for Ljubljana in the European context – upon the 500th anniversary of their granting / SUMMARY: The Criminal Justice Freedoms for Ljubljana represent an important link in the evolution of criminal law. They are among the first enactments solely devoted to criminal law in the then Lower Austrian Lands and in Europe at large. Moreover, they can be considered one of the first penal sources to concurrently regulate procedural and substantive law. They belong to a group of four regulations with very similar intendment and substance that were named the Maximilian Criminal Codes (Maximilianischen Halsgerichtsordnungen) after the legislator. The Criminal Justice Freedoms granted the Ljubljana court jurisdiction to adjudicate over and execute judgements in the gravest criminal matters (Malefiz). The court’s elevated status indicates the importance and consolidation of the town’s power compared to other holders of judicial power within the broader territory, which is particularly important in terms of jurisdictional disputes. The procedural provisions of the Freedoms require the consistent prosecution and punishment of the gravest criminal offences in accordance with the defined rules and in the public interest. In contrast to other related norms, the Freedoms place special emphasis on the principle of officiality in the case of homicide. In this perspective, the Freedoms are a typical example of an early attempt to centralise power by means of the unification of law in terms of both substance and territory as well as to abolish particularism, along with the customary rules for resolving conflicts in a society. Given their intendment and substance, the Criminal Justice Freedoms for Ljubljana may be considered a precursor of the uniform criminal law for the Empire as they basically codified the same principles that were later, albeit in a more sophisticated and supplemented manner, introduced in the Constitutio Criminalis Carolina. They were already formulated under the influence of learned law and are undoubtedly the result of the reception of the Roman-canon procedure. Its fundamental consequence in the Freedoms is the accentuated role of the inquisitorial procedure together with the principle of officiality and torture as well as the related secrecy, written form and indirectness of the procedure. / KEYWORDS: criminal law, inquisitorial procedure, principle of officiality, reception of Roman law, Constitutio Criminalis Carolina, centralisation of power, public order, revenge
Strani:	str. 629-652
Letnik:	ǂLetn. ǂ25
Zvezek:	ǂšt. ǂ3
Čas izdaje:	2017
DOI:	10.19233/AH.2017.30
ID:	16479244