diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
Gregor Kristan (Avtor), Gorazd Meško (Mentor)

Povzetek

Danes smo soočeni z vedno hitrejšimi in intenzivnejšimi spremembami na svetu, ki vplivajo na globalno varnosti. Z letom 2020 smo bili soočeni z globalno zdravstveno krizo, ki jo je sprožil izbruh virusa SARS-CoV-2. Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija (WHO) je 30. januarja razglasila, da izbruh predstavlja svetovno nevarnost za javno zdravje. Izbruh virusa SARS-CoV-2 so prvič zaznali decembra 2019 na Kitajskem v mestu Wuhan, tri mesece kasneje pa je virus že dosegel pandemske razsežnosti po celem svetu. V nalogi smo se osredotočili na tri države in raziskali ter analizirali ukrepe proti epidemiji nalezljive bolezni COVID-19. Najprej smo sledili hierarhiji obveščanja in ukrepanja, od globalne ravni do državne ravni, na katerih poteka glavna bitka z epidemijo nalezljive bolezni. V prvi vrsti smo raziskali vrste ukrepov, ki jih imajo države na razpolago ob kriznih razmerah in nato še analizirali ukrepanje držav Švedske, Norveške in Slovenije. Ugotovili smo, da imajo te države zelo podobne načrte pripravljenosti in odzivanja na epidemijo nalezljive bolezni. Kljub temu smo opazili, da se je ukrepanje držav razlikovalo po strogosti ukrepov. Švedska država je za razliko od Norveške in Slovenije do epidemije COVID-19 pristopila z bolj mehkim pristopom omejevanja in zapiranja ter posledično imela več okužb in smrti. Norveška in Slovenija sta imeli ostrejše ukrepe in kot rezultat v prvem valu epidemije imeli tudi manj okužb in smrti v primerjavi s Švedsko. Je pa Slovenija v drugem valu celo v primerjavi s Švedsko imela, kljub najstrožjim ukrepom proti epidemiji COVID-19, največ okužb in smrti. Iz tega sklepamo, da je pri odzivanju na epidemijo zelo pomembno, da ukrepanje politike sledi nasvetom strokovnjakov, ki obvladajo svojo stroko. V nasprotnem primeru lahko hitro postanejo ukrepi nejasni in nerazumljivi, kar privede do delnega upoštevanja ali celo neupoštevanja ukrepov. S tem se zmeda med učinkovitostjo ukrepov in neučinkovitostjo še povečuje in privede do primera, ki smo ga imeli v Sloveniji.

Ključne besede

epidemije;zaprtje;diplomske naloge;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.11 - Diplomsko delo
Organizacija: UM FVV - Fakulteta za varnostne vede
Založnik: [G. Kristan]
UDK: 343.9:616-036.2(043.2)
COBISS: 145134595 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 12
Št. prenosov: 0
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov: Effectiveness of measures against the COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia - a comparison with Norway and Sweden
Sekundarni povzetek: Presently, we are faced with ever faster and more intense changes in the world, which affect global security. In 2020, we were faced with a global health crisis triggered by the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. On the 30th of January, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a global public health emergency. The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was first detected in December 2019 in the city of Wuhan, China, and three months later the virus had already reached pandemic proportions around the world In the assignment, we focused on three countries where we researched and analysed the measures used against the epidemic of the infectious disease COVID-19. First, we followed the hierarchy of information and action, from the global level to the national level, at which the main battle with the infectious disease epidemic is taking place. First of all, we investigated the types of measures available to countries in crises and then analysed the actions of the countries of Sweden, Norway and Slovenia. We found that these countries have very similar infectious disease epidemic preparedness and response plans. Nevertheless, we observed that countries' actions differed in the severity of said measures. Sweden, unlike Norway and Slovenia, approached the COVID-19 epidemic with a softer approach of restriction and closure, and as a result, had more infections and deaths. Norway and Slovenia had stricter measures and as a result in the first wave of the epidemic also had fewer infections and deaths compared to Sweden. However, in the second wave, even compared to Sweden, despite the strictest measures against the COVID-19 epidemic, Slovenia had the most infections and deaths. From this, we conclude that when responding to an epidemic, it is very important that politicians follow the advice of experts who master their profession. Otherwise, measures can quickly become unclear and incomprehensible, leading to partial or even non-compliance. This increases the confusion between the effectiveness of the measures and the ineffectiveness and leads to the case we had in Slovenia.
Sekundarne ključne besede: Covid-19;Varnostni ukrepi;Slovenija;Norveška;Švedska;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Diplomsko delo/naloga
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede, Ljubljana
Strani: VII f., 50 str.
ID: 18296014