diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
Abstract
V uvodnem delu diplomskega dela je predstavljeno zakaj je varovanje državnih voditeljev in ostalih državnikov pomembno, kakšna je zgodovina nastanka enot za osebno varovanje in kaj bo sam cilj diplomskega dela. Glavna naloga je bila se osredotočiti in diplomo izdelati v okviru postavljenih hipotez. V nadaljevanju so predstavljeni nekateri pojmi s področja varovanja. Nato so glede na javno dostopne podatke predstavljene službe za varovanje nekaterih pomembnih oseb in objektov izbranih držav. To so Center za varovanje in zaščito slovenske policije,kanadska Royal canadian mounted police, indijske Special protection group, President's bodyguards, National security guard in oddelek delhiške policije, izraelski Shin Bet, nigerijska State security service, novozelandski Diplomatic protection service, filipinski Presidential security group, poljski Buiro ochrony rzadu, romunski Serviciul de protectie si paza, južnokorejski Presidential security service, švedski Sakerhetspolisen, vatikanska Švicarska garda ter United states secret service in Diplomatic security service Združenih držav Amerike. Službe so pod državo v kateri delujejo opisane tako, da je najprej opisana njihova zgodovina nastanka, nato pa se je ugotavljalo pod kakšno matično telo spadajo, koliko služb ali enot za varovanje pomembni oseb v državi sploh je in katere funkcionarje varujejo. Po tem so službe za varovanje iz vseh izbranih tujih držav posamično primerjane s Centrom za varovanje in zaščito slovenske policije. Zaključek diplomske naloge vsebuje potrditve oziroma zavrnitve na začetku postavljenih hipotez. Ugotovljeno je, da službe za varovanje nekaterih pomembnih oseb in objektov različnih držav, z manjšimi odstopanji varujejo primerljive funkcionarje. Prav tako je lahko razbrano, da nimajo vse izbrane države le po eno takšno službo in, da niso razvrščene pod primerljiva matična telesa.
Keywords
policija;varovanje;osebno varovanje;Center za varovanje in zaščito;organiziranost;primerjave;diplomske naloge;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2017 |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice |
Publisher: |
[M. Urankar] |
UDC: |
351.741(043.2) |
COBISS: |
3448298
|
Views: |
1099 |
Downloads: |
112 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
Comparing Slovenian Security and protection centre with some similar units around the world |
Secondary abstract: |
In the introduction there are presented some reasons why it is essential to protect state leaders and other dignitaries. There is talk about history of personal protection and how it came into existence and what is the goal of this diploma. My main task was to focus around hypothesis and finish the work resolving them. In the following there are presented some concepts which fall in to the field of personal protection. Than on the basis of publicly achievable data there are presented personal protection agencies of some chosen states around the world. These are Security and protection centre of the Slovenian police, Canadian Royal canadian mounted police, Indian Special protection group, President's bodyguards, National security guard and a wing of Delhi police department, Israeli Shin Bet, Nigerian State security agency, New Zealand’s Diplomatic protection service, Philippines Presidential security group, Polish Buiro ochrony rzadu, Romanian Serviciul de protectie si paza, South Korean Presidential security service, Swedish Sakerhetspolisen, Vatican’s Swiss guard and the United states secret service along with Diplomatic security service of the United states of America. These agencies, in their own specific state, firstly present the history of their establishment, and then by figuring out under whose authority each of them operates on, how many official agencies which do this type of work are there in a certain country and who they protect. Then they are all individually compared to the Slovenian Security and protection centre. My diploma thesis end with confirmation or disproving of initially set hypothesis. The conclusion is that all the countries with their agencies are protecting more or less the same or comparable dignitaries. Also there is pointed out that all chosen countries do not have only one agency protecting dignitaries and that these agencies are not under comparable jurisdiction offices. |
Secondary keywords: |
presentation;comparison;protective services;personal protection;assassination; |
URN: |
URN:SI:UM: |
Type (COBISS): |
Bachelor thesis/paper |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede |
Pages: |
V, 37 str. |
ID: |
10873824 |