Posredni storilec pri kaznivem dejanju

(magistrska naloga)

Marija Maver (Author), Vid Jakulin (Mentor)

Abstract

Posredno storilstvo je eden najnovejših uzakonjenih institutov s področja kazenskega prava. Od leta 2008 je v Kazenskem zakoniku (KZ-1) opredeljen kot oblika storilca, ki izvrši kaznivo dejanje z izrabljanjem in vodenjem drugega. Sodna praksa in teorija sta posredno storilstvo uporabljali že prej, vendar ne izrecno. Uporaba ni bila sporna, čeprav so nekateri teoretiki nasprotovali posrednemu storilstvu, ker da v sistemu limitirane akcesornosti udeležbe, kot je naš, to ni potrebno. V teoriji je utemeljeno na teoriji o oblasti nad dejanjem. Posredni storilec tipično z zmoto ali prisilo neposrednega storilca izrabi za izvršitev kaznivega dejanja. On je tisti, ki vse organizira in vodi, ima pregled in oblast nad celotnim dejanjem, le neposredno izvršitev prepusti neposrednemu storilcu. Konstrukcija posrednega storilstva je primerna tudi za t. i. organiziran aparat moči, čeprav so v tem primeru neposredni storilci povsem kazensko odgovorni.

Keywords

kazensko pravo;kazniva dejanja;posredno storilstvo;teorija oblasti nad dejanjem;limitirana akcesornost udeležbe;napeljevanje;organizirani aparat moči;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2017
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[M. Maver]
UDC:	343(043.2)
COBISS:	15988049
Views:	1442
Downloads:	1205
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Indirect perpetrator in a criminal offense
Secondary abstract:	Indirect perpetration is one of the most recent law-enforcement institutes in the field of criminal law. It was introduced into Slovenian law system in 2008. In Criminal Code, it is defined as a form of perpetrator committing a criminal offense through the exploitation and management of the another. Indirect perpetration was used in case law and in theory before, but not explicitly. The use was not controversial, although some theorists opposed to it, because in the system of limited accessibility of participation, such as our own, it is not necessary. Indirect perpetration is based on the control-theory of perpetration. The indirect perpetrator typically uses the direct perpetrator for the commission of a crime by mistake or coercion. He is the one who organizes and conducts everything, has an overview and authority over the entire act, but only direct enforcement is left to the direct perpetrator. The construction of the indirect perpetration is also suitable for so-called organized power structures, despite the fact that in this case the direct perpetrators are entirely criminal liable.
Secondary keywords:	criminal law;criminal offence;indirect perpetration;the control-theory of perpetration;limited accessibility of participation;theory of innocent agency;instigation;organised power structures;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	V, 37 f.
ID:	10915143