Teža iracionalnega v procesu sodniškega odločanja

kognitivne pristranskosti in mehanizmi zasledovanja fikcije razumskosti prava

Abstract

V modernem pravnem redu igrajo logika, razum in z razumom povezano silogstično sklepanje pomembno vlogo. To ugotovitev avtor primerja s spoznanji moderne psihologije, ki se nanašajo na proces človekovega odločanja. Pri tem se osredotoča predvsem na dve pojavni obliki kognitivnih pristranskosti: sidranje oz. anchoring in retrospektivno pristranskost oz. hindsight bias. Prav tako se avtor vrednostno opredeli do instrumentov, ki so zakonodajalcu na voljo za preprečevanje prekomernega vdora iracionalnega v proces sodniškega odločanja - za zasledovanje fikcije razumskosti prava. V zaključnem delu prispevka je na podlagi tega spoznanja poudarjena potreba po interdisciplinarnem pristopu v pravu. Ta je nujna, ker je le tako mogoče sistematično in samoreflektivno soočanje z iracionalnostjo v procesu sodniškega odločanja.

Keywords

razum;iracionalnost;odločanje;ratio;silogistično sklepanje;pristranskost;logika;pravo;psihologija;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2015
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UM PF - Faculty of Law
UDC:	340.1
COBISS:	5140779
ISSN:	1855-7147
Parent publication:	Lexonomica
Views:	1379
Downloads:	97
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	The role of irrationality in the process of the judicial decision-making
Secondary abstract:	The article outlines the importance of reason and reasoning based on categorical syllogisms - and the role they play in modern legal thought. The author compares the role of reason in western legal systems with findings concerning the processes of irrational decision-making, as portrayed by modern psychology. Emphasis is given on the role of anchoring and hindsight bias. The mechanisms with which legislators tackle those cognitive illusions are also briefly presented. In the conclusion, the author argues that an interdisciplinary approach to law is necessary to uphold the fiction of law as a rational category. A self-reflective and systematic approach is needed to tackle the problem of irrationality in judicial decision-making. This approach is only possible with knowledge of both, law and psychology.
Secondary keywords:	ratio;hindsight bias;anchoring;irrationality;judicial decision-making;logic;law;psychology;
URN:	URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS):	Scientific work
Pages:	str. 189-204
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ7
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ2
Chronology:	dec. 2015
ID:	10950050