estetika strukture mita
Urška Jenčič (Author), Lev Kreft (Mentor), Vid Snoj (Mentor)

Abstract

Diplomsko delo poskuša na področje literature aplicirati filozofsko-antropološki strukturalni pristop k analizi mita, ki ga je v navezavi na ameriško mitologijo razvil Lévi-Strauss. Med mitom in literaturo obstaja mnogo podobnosti in ločnic, ki jih poskušam osvetliti na podlagi analize dveh velikih manifestaciji mita o Odiseju v evropski literaturi, Homerjeve Odiseje in Joyceovega Uliksa. Zanima me, kaj je v teh literarnih delih mitskega in kaj nemitskega. V skladu s strukturalnim pristopom sta osrednji predvsem vprašanji, kakšen je mit kot struktura in kaj v strukturi mita privede do njegove umetniške realizacije v literarnih delih, ki obenem mit ponavljajo in nadaljujejo, čeprav sama, strogo rečeno, niso mit. Prav tako se osredotočam na mit v njegovi estetski vrednosti, ki je lahko zunaj ali znotraj polja umetnosti, ker ne izhaja povsem iz umetniške obdelave, ampak prav iz mitske strukture, ki ne sme biti opredeljena formalistično, brez ozira na vsebino, ki je neločljivo povezana s formo.

Keywords

mit;umetnost;strukturalizem;estetika;literatura;Odiseja;Ulikses;diplomska dela;Homerus;8. st. pr.n.š.;Joyce;James;1882-1941;Lévi-Strauss;Claude;1908-2009;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL FF - Faculty of Arts
Publisher: [U. Jenčič]
UDC: 82.091:165.191
COBISS: 67779426 Link will open in a new window
Views: 848
Downloads: 278
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: The following undergraduate thesis attempts to apply the philosophically-anthropological structuralist approach to the analysis of myth, developed by Lévi-Strauss in relation to American mythology, to literature. There are many similarities and discrepancies between myth and literature that I am trying to illuminate on the grounds of analysis of two great manifestations of the myth of Odysseus, Homer's Odyssey and Joyce's Ulysses. I am interested in what can be considered mythic and un-mythic in these literary works. In accordance with the structuralist approach, the central questions are mainly what is myth like as a structure, and what in the structure of myth contributes to its artistic realisation in literary works that recommence and continue myth, even though they, strictly speaking, are not myths. I am also focusing on the aesthetic value of myth that lies both outside and inside of the art field, because it does not originate completely from artistic processing, but specifically from the mythic structure that should not be defined formalistically, without regard to the content which is inseparable from form.
Secondary keywords: myth;art;structuralism;aesthetics;literature;Odyssey;Ulysses;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za filozofijo, Oddelek za primerjalno književnost in literarno teorijo
Pages: III, 69 str.
ID: 10976808
Recommended works:
, analiza Odisejevega lika v homerskih epih in v Shakespearjevi drami Troil in Kresida
, primerjava Homerjeve Iliade in Petersenove Troje
, no subtitle data available
, no subtitle data available