magistrsko delo
Tadeja Nemanič (Author), Zlatan Magajna (Mentor)

Abstract

V magistrski nalogi obravnavam vpliv stila spoznavanja na delo s fizičnimi in virtualnimi učnimi pripomočki pri pouku matematike. V teoretičnem delu predstavljam značilnosti fizičnih in virtualnih učnih pripomočkov in razlike med njimi. Na učinkovitost uporabe učnih pripomočkov vplivajo številni dejavniki, med drugim tudi spoznavni stili učencev. Fizične in virtualne pripomočke zato povežem z učnimi stili po Kolbu in stili spoznavanja po Rancourtu. Predstavim značilnosti posameznih stilov in vprašalnik stilov spoznavanja po Rancourtu. Empirični del naloge temelji na kvantitativni raziskavi, v okviru katere ugotavljam, kako uspešni so učenci noetičnega, empiričnega in racionalnega modusa pri reševanju nalog na fizični in na virtualni geoplošči. Ugotavljam tudi uspešnost učencev pri delu s fizično in virtualno geoploščo glede na to, ali učenec raje dela s fizično geoploščo, virtualno geoploščo ali brez geoplošče.

Keywords

fizični učni pripomočki;virtualni učni pripomočki;stili spoznavanja po Rancourtu;učni stili po Kolbu;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PEF - Faculty of Education
Publisher: [T. Nemanič]
UDC: 51:373.3(043.2)
COBISS: 12249161 Link will open in a new window
Views: 440
Downloads: 82
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Cognitive styles and learning mathematics with virtual and concrete manipulatives
Secondary abstract: The master thesis considers how cognitive styles affect the work with physical and virtual learning manipulatives in a mathematics class. In the theoretical part, I present the characteristics of virtual and physical manipulatives and the differences between them. The effectiveness of the use of learning manipulatives depends on several factors, including the way in which pupils elaborate the acquired information in the classroom. Thus I relate physical and virtual manipulatives with Kolb’s learning styles and Rancourt's cognitive styles. I present the characteristics of various cognitive styles and the Rancourt’s questionnaire of cognitive styles. The empirical part of the thesis consists of a quantitative study in which pupils with predominant noetic, empiric, and rational modus solve tasks on physical and on virtual geoboard. I also consider the performance of pupils that prefer using virtual, physical or no geoboard in solving tasks using physical and virtual geoboard.
Secondary keywords: mathematics;teaching;matematika;pouk;
File type: application/pdf
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fak., Predmetno poučevanje: Matematika-računalništvo
Pages: 65 str.
ID: 10994456