magistrsko delo
Abstract
Raziskujemo partnersko nezvestobo, kot jo obravnavajo terapevti relacijske družinske terapije (RDT), v kontekstu razlik med sodobno laično in katoliško spolno moralo, saj študij tega pristopa poteka na Teološki fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani. Predstavljamo teorijo in prakso RDT ter partnerski in terapevtski odnos. Navedemo vrste, vzroke in posledice nezvestobe, opisujemo tudi krščanski vidik nezvestobe in potek zdravljenja v RDT. Nezvestobo postavljamo v kontekst različnih spolnih moral: k sodobni laični opredelitvi nezvestobe kot kršitve dogovora med partnerjema, katoliški vidik dodaja, da je nezvestoba izraz vdaje poželenju ter greh proti svetosti zakonske zveze. Z intervjuji s terapevti iščemo odgovor na raziskovalno vprašanje, ali in kakšen vpliv ima katoliški izobraževalni okvir na terapevtsko delo z nezvestobo. Terapevti imajo do klientov nevtralno držo; poudarjajo etičen in na dobrobit klienta usmerjen odnos. Morebitno katoliško ozadje uporabijo kot orodje za delo z vernimi klienti. Pri raziskovalnem vprašanju, ali in kako terapevti RDT pri obravnavi partnerske nezvestobe prečijo razkorak med različnimi spolnimi moralami, ugotavljamo, da se terapevti ne srečujejo z lastno razpetostjo, saj svojo profesionalno vlogo učinkovito ločijo od krščanskega nauka. Dodatno proučujemo, kako poteka delo terapevtov s klienti pri nezvestobi. Zaznavamo odprtost za različne tehnike in pristope, po sistemu "uporabi, kar deluje". Zanima nas tudi, ali in kako na terapevtsko obravnavo nezvestobe vpliva katoliška vera terapevtov oz. klientov. Vernost terapevtov ima potencialno pozitiven vpliv, saj zaradi tega hitreje razumejo verne kliente in jim lažje pomagajo – četudi je delo z njimi težje.
Keywords
nezvestoba;spolna morala;relacijska družinska terapija;postmoderna družba;Spolna etika;Družinska terapija;Postmodernizem;Krščanstvo;Magistrska dela;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2019 |
Typology: |
2.09 - Master's Thesis |
Organization: |
UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences |
Publisher: |
[M. V. Vajda] |
UDC: |
316.36:17(043.3) |
COBISS: |
36240733
|
Views: |
690 |
Downloads: |
289 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
Infidelity from the perspective of relational family therapy within the context of different sexual moralities |
Secondary abstract: |
Our focus is infidelity as seen by the relational family therapy (RFT) model in the context of the differences between secular post-modern and Catholic sexual morality, since RFT therapists are being trained at the Faculty of Theology, University of Ljubljana. RFT theory and practice are presented, as well as couple and therapeutic relationships. Varieties, causes and consequences of infidelity are defined, followed by the Christian view of infidelity and the RFT healing process. Infidelity is contextualized within different sexual moralities. Contemporary sexual morality defines it as a breach of trust in a relationship; Catholic morality emphasizes yielding to temptation and sinning against the holy matrimony. By interviewing RFT practitioners we investigate our research question: does the Catholic educational context influence the work of therapists with infidelity, and how. Therapists retain a neutral attitude toward the clients; they emphasize an ethical and client-focused stance. Catholic beliefs, if present, are a resource for working with religious clients. We also ask if therapists need to cope with differing sexual moralities when working with infidelity. RFT therapists aren't torn over this, separating their professional role from Christian teaching. Additionally, we analyze the RFT work process with infidelity and find openness to various techniques and approaches, following the "use what works" principle. We also investigate the effect of religiosity of therapists or clients on therapeutic work with infidelity. Religiosity of therapists has a potentially positive influence, since it enables them to relate better to religious clients – even though working with them is more challenging. |
Secondary keywords: |
Sexual ethics;Family therapy;Postmodernism;Christianity;Master's theses; |
Type (COBISS): |
Master's thesis/paper |
Study programme: |
0 |
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): |
1970-01-01 |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za družbene vede |
Pages: |
132 str. |
ID: |
11161921 |