magistrsko delo
Abstract
Učenje učenja je danes ena od ključnih življenjskih zmožnosti/kompetenc. Zelo pomembno je, da se znajo učenci sami učiti. Ena od temeljnih strategij predelave snovi je pisanje obnove besedila. S pisanjem dobrih obnov lahko posamezniki izboljšujejo svoje učne sposobnosti in učni uspeh.
V raziskavi smo želeli ugotoviti, ali znajo učenci 5. razreda sami tvoriti obnovo besedila. Zato smo izvedli kvalitativno in kvantitativno raziskavo. Učenci so pisali obnovo odlomka iz učbenika za naravoslovje in tehniko (5. razred). Te obnove smo nato analizirali po določenih merilih. Učenci, njihovi učitelji in tudi drugi učitelji 5. razreda pa so izpolnjevali tudi anketni vprašalnik, ker nas je zanimalo, kako se učenci učijo tvoriti obnovo in kaj jim pri tem povzroča težave, pri katerih predmetih poleg slovenščine še pišejo obnovo in ali pišejo kdaj tudi obnovo odlomka iz učnega gradiva za razne predmete.
Iz analize obnov učencev izhaja, da zna skoraj polovica učencev 5. razreda tvoriti pisno obnovo besedila iz učnega gradiva. Slabosti njihovih obnov so: vanjo ne vključijo vseh pravilnih bistvenih podatkov iz izhodiščnega besedila, vanjo pa dodajajo nove podatke, napačne podatke in lastne izkušnje. Povedi v obnovi učencev pogosto niso sovisne (se ne navezujejo druga na drugo). Težave jim povzročajo tudi pravopisna pravila. Tudi večina učiteljev meni, da imajo učenci težave z določanjem bistva. Nekaj manj učiteljev je odgovorilo, da učencem težave povzroča oblikovanje (pravilnih) povedi. Učitelji navajajo tudi, da imajo učenci težave z delitvijo besedila na odstavke.
Učenci obravnavajo in pišejo obnovo pri slovenščini, a tudi pri družbi, naravoslovju in tehniki ter gospodinjstvu. Približno tretjina učencev pravi, da morajo pri pouku večkrat napisati obnovo poglavja iz učbenika, dobra polovica, da to storijo samo redkokdaj, okoli 15 % pa, da jim tega ni treba narediti nikoli. Na vprašanje, ali so morali učenci kdaj napisati obnovo poglavja iz učbenika, je 75 % učiteljev odgovorilo pritrdilno.
Največ učencev navaja, da je učenje tvorjenja obnove pri pouku slovenščine v 5. razredu potekalo tako, da jim je učiteljica najprej povedala, kaj je obnova, kakšen je postopek pisanja obnove in kaj vsebuje obnova. Nato so skupaj napisali obnovo nekega besedila ali pa si ogledali primer besedila in njegovo obnovo.
Keywords
učenje učenja;obnova;besedilo iz učnega gradiva;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2019 |
Typology: |
2.09 - Master's Thesis |
Organization: |
UL PEF - Faculty of Education |
Publisher: |
[K. Dolenc] |
UDC: |
811.163.6:373.3(043.2) |
COBISS: |
12676937
|
Views: |
458 |
Downloads: |
62 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
The ability of the fifth graders to form summaries |
Secondary abstract: |
Today, learning to learn is one of the key abilities/competencies in life. It is very important that students can learn by themselves. One of the basic strategies of processed subject matter is writing a summary of a text. By writing good summaries, individuals can improve their learning abilities and their academic success.
In the research, we wished to ascertain whether the students of the 5th grade can form a summary of the text by themselves. Therefore, we performed qualitative and quantitative research. The students wrote a summary of a passage from the textbook for Science and Technology (the 5th grade). Then, we analyzed these summaries according to certain standards. The students, their teachers, and also the other teachers of the 5th grade also filled in the survey questionnaire because we were interested in how the students learn to form a summary and what causes them problems in the process, at which subjects in addition to Slovenian language, they write summaries, and whether they also write a summary of a part of the learning material for various subjects.
The analysis of the summaries of the students shows that almost half of the students of the 5th grade can form a written summary of the text from the learning material. The weaknesses of their summaries are the following. They do not include all the accurate essential information from the original text in the summary. They add new information, false information, and their own experiences in the summary. Sentences in summaries are often not consistent internally (they are not connected with each other). Grammatical rules also cause them problems. Most of the teachers believe that the students have problems with determining the essence. A bit fewer teachers responded that forming (appropriate) sentences cause problems for the students. Teachers also stated that the students have problems with dividing texts into paragraphs.
The students discuss and write summaries within the Slovenian language, but also within the Social Sciences, Science and Technology, and Home Economics. Approximately a third of students say that they have to write a summary of a chapter in a textbook during school lessons. More than half of the students say that they do this only rarely. Approximately 15% of students say, however, that they never have to do it. 75% of the teachers answered the question, whether the students have to write a summary of a chapter in a textbook occasionally, affirmatively.
Most of the students say that learning to form a summary within the lessons of Slovenian language in the 5th grade took place so that the teacher first explained what the summary is, what the procedure of writing of the summary is, and what the summary includes. Then, they wrote a summary of a text together or took a look at an example of a text and its summary. |
Secondary keywords: |
primary education;Slovenian language;osnovnošolski pouk;slovenščina; |
File type: |
application/pdf |
Type (COBISS): |
Master's thesis/paper |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fak., Poučevanje, Poučevanje na razredni stopnji z angleščino |
Pages: |
80 str. |
ID: |
11287854 |