Problematika trditvenega in dokaznega bremena v pravdnem postopku

magistrsko diplomsko delo

Neja Štaba Pečnik (Author), Aleš Galič (Mentor)

Abstract

Trditveno in dokazno breme je uzakonitev razpravnega načela. V svojem bistvu sta to dve ločeni bremeni pravdnih strank, ki morajo za svoj uspeh v pravdi zadostiti obema. Trditveno breme na stranko nalaga, da poda jasne, konkretne in popolne trditve o dejstvih, na katere opira svoje zahtevke oziroma ugovore, in da konkretno prereka navedbe nasprotne stranke. Dokazno breme pa od stranke terja, da poda substancirane dokazne predloge, kar pomeni, da mora ob dokaznem predlogu navesti, zakaj je dokaz pravno relevanten in ugotavljanju katerega dejstva služi. Materialno trditveno in dokazno breme je ves čas postopka na isti stranki, medtem ko je procesno trditveno in dokazno breme odvisno od navedb in dokazov nasprotne stranke in v postopku prehaja od ene na drugo. Omilitev razpravnega načela je materialno procesno vodstvo, omejitev razpravnega načela pa so prekluzije. Magistrsko delo najprej preučuje zahteve naslovnih bremen, na koncu pa obravnava problematične materialnopravne določbe, pri čemer se pri obeh delih osredotoča na sodno prakso, ki pogosto odpira številno problematiko naslovnih bremen.

Keywords

civilno procesno pravo;pravdni postopek;trditveno breme;dokazno breme;skrbnost strank;konkretizirane navedbe;substancirani dokazni predlogi;sodna praksa;Slovenija;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2020
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[N. Štaba Pečnik]
UDC:	347.91/.95(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS:	28695043
Views:	1057
Downloads:	267
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Issues regarding burden of allegation and burden of proof in civil proceedings
Secondary abstract:	Burden of allegation and burden of proof are enactment of adversary principle. In essence, these are two separate burdens of litigants who must satisfy them both to succeed in litigation. Burden of allegation or duty to substantiate a claim requires the litigant to provide clear, concrete and complete statements about the facts, by which their claims or objections are substantiated, and to contest the other party's claims in a concrete manner. Burden of proof requires the litigant to provide a substantiated request for proof, which means that they have to explain why the evidence is relevant and which fact it serves to establish. The same party is a subject of substantive burden of allegation and burden of proof throughout the proceedings, while the procedural burden of allegation and burden of proof depend on the statements and proof provided by the opposing party and passes from one to another throughout the proceedings. The relaxation of adversary principle is substantive conduct of proceedings, while the limitation of adversary principle are preclusions. The master's thesis firstly examines the requirements of burden of allegation and burden of proof and at the end, it deals with problematic substantive provisions, throughout focusing on the case law, which often opens up many issues regarding the titled burdens.
Secondary keywords:	civil procedure;burden of allegation;burden of proof;parties' diligence;concrete statements;substantiated request for proof;case law;Slovenia;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	IV, 54 f.
ID:	12036962