Planiranje izobraževanja in menedžment sprememb

Metod Černetič (Author), Olga Dečman Dobrnjič (Author)

Abstract

Načrtovanje izobraževanja je bilo, kot ločena dejavnost, pozno vpeljano na splošno področje ekonomskega in družbenega načrtovanja. Močno se je povečalo s potrebo po ureditvi/soočenju s populacijsko eksplozijo v poznih štiridesetih prejšnjega stoletja in je bilo okrepljeno z rastjo zavedanja ekonomske vrednosti izobraževanja. Dandanes je povezanost med načrtovanjem izobraževanja in ekonomsko razvitostjo oz. med vsemi vidiki izobraževanja in ekonomsko razvitostjo deležna vedno večje pozornosti, ki vodi do naraščanja potreb po načrtovanju razvoja. Oblikovane so razne strategije z določenimi cilji, ki naj bi bili prevedeni v prihodnji čas. Optimalne izobrazbene strukture “države” ali nacionalne makroekonomije za bodoči tehnološki razvoj danes še ni mogoče napovedovati. Razlogov je več: tehnološki, ekonomski in socialni. Zato je bil oblikovan tudi tako imenovan hevristični pristop oziroma model planiranja kadrov (Rus, 1979: 247, Černetič, 1999: 86). V tem modelu oziroma pristopu se vzpostavljajo štiri predpostavke: družbeni cilji, relevantne družbene okoliščine, kadrovski potencial in kadrovske potrebe. Kvantitativno in kvalitativno proučevanje odnosa med temi variablami hevrističnega pristopa je dinamičen proces. V prispevku bodo obravnavana naslednja vprašanja: o metodah in scenarijih načrtovanja izobraževanja, predvidevanja in napovedi razvoja izobraževanja, raziskovalno in normativno napovedovanje izobraževanja, področja in dileme planiranja izobraževanja ter cilji organizacije in menedžment sprememb. Vsa ta vprašanja so še kako aktualna z vključitvijo Slovenije v EU in v procese, ki v njej potekajo Predvsem gre za deduktiven pristop pri dveh pomembnih družbenih dokumentih/resolucijah: Nacionalni program razvoja visokega šolstva in Nacionalni program razvoja raziskovalne dejavnosti. Pri enem in drugem uvajanju so bili poleg politike premalo vključeni drugi nosilci sprememb.

Keywords

izobraževanje;politika izobraževanja;načrtovanje;cilji;vzgoja;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2006
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UM FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences
Publisher:	Moderna organizacija
UDC:	37.014
COBISS:	4982035
ISSN:	1318-5454
Views:	1108
Downloads:	65
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Education Planning and Management of Changes
Secondary abstract:	Background/Purpose: Planning of education as a separate activity was relatively lately introduced on universal area of economic and social planning. The need for planning education has increased heavily with a need for regulation of explosion of population in late forties in last century. It has been reinforced with a growth of consciousness of value of economical value of education. Nowadays the connection between planning of education and economical development is getting more and more attention, which leads to increasing need for planning of development. Different strategies with fixed aims were developed. Optimal educational structures of a »state« or national macroeconomic for future technological development can not be predict even today. Reason for that are different: technological, economical in social. Therefore so-called hauristical approach or model of human resource planning has been developed (Rus, 1979: 247, Černetič, 1999: 86). Four presumptions are established in this model: social goals, relative social circumstances, human resource potential and needs. Quantitative and qualitative study of relationship between those variables of heuretical approach is a dynamic approach. In this text the following questions will be address: of methods and scenarios of educational planning, assumptions and predictions of planning of education, research and normative prediction of educational planning, areas and dilemmas of planning of education and goals of organizations and management of changes. All this questions are deeply connected with inclusion of Slovenia in EU and with all the processes that are going on in EU. Above all this is a deductive approach to two important social documents: National program of development of higher education and National program of development of research activity.
Secondary keywords:	education;policy of education;planning;goals;
URN:	URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	Str. 475-481
Volume:	39
Issue:	8
ID:	1741198