Zanesljivost VaR modelov v izjemnih okoliščinah

diplomsko delo

Matjaž Žunko (Author), Drago Bokal (Mentor), Timotej Jagrič (Co-mentor)

Abstract

Tvegana vrednost (VaR) je pogosto uporabljena mera tržnega tveganja. Izračunamo ga lahko po različnih metodah, ki jih delimo v tri skupine: parametrične linearne metode, metode zgodovinske simulacije in Monte Carlo metode. Na njih temelječi VaR modeli so bili na preizkusu v izjemnih okoliščinah, kakršne je predstavljala svetovna finančna kriza. V diplomskem delu so predstavljene osnovne VaR metode. Ustrezni VaR modeli so testirani na podatkih cen delnic portfeljev, sestavljenih iz nekaterih delnic indeksov SBI 20, DAX 30 in XMI. Opisan je način testiranja teh modelov. Rezultati kažejo, da so za dnevne VaR napovedi najprimernejši modeli zgodovinske simulacije, za 10-dnevne napovedi Gumbelov linearni VaR model, za mesečne in kvartalne napovedi pa so se vsi testirani modeli izkazali za nezanesljive.

Keywords

portfelj;analiza;tvegana vrednost;zgodovinski test;diplomska dela;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2010
Source:	Maribor
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM FNM - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
Publisher:	[M. Žunko]
UDC:	51(043.2)
COBISS:	17984008
Views:	2224
Downloads:	226
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Reliability of VaR models in extreme circumstances
Secondary abstract:	Value-at-Risk (VaR) is a widely used measure of market risk. It can be calculated by different methods, which are divided into three groups: parametric linear methods, historical simulation methods and Monte Carlo methods. VaR models, based on these methods, were on a trial in extreme circumstances such as represented by the global financial crisis. This thesis presents the basic VaR methods. The corresponding VaR models are tested on the data of share prices of portfolios, consisting of certain shares from SBI 20, DAX 30 and XMI indices. A method of testing these models is described. The results show that for daily VaR forecasts historical simulation models exhibit best performance, for 10-day forecasts Gumbel's linear VaR model performs best, while for monthly and quarterly forecasts, all the tested models were proven to be unreliable.
Secondary keywords:	portfolio;analysis;Value-at-Risk;backtest;
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Fakulteta za naravoslovje in matematiko, Oddelek za matematiko in računalništvo
Pages:	IX, 68 f., XIX f. pril.
Keywords (UDC):	mathematics;natural sciences;naravoslovne vede;matematika;mathematics;matematika;
ID:	18915