diplomski projekt
Davor Kržišnik (Author), Jožica Gričar (Reviewer), Katarina Čufar (Mentor)

Abstract

Identificirali smo les iz arheološkega najdišča v Ljubljani, ki se je ohranil v mokrem okolju. Arheologi so predhodno razdelili les v 3 skupine, in sicer glede na njegov izvor iz obdobja prazgodovine, mlajše železne dobe (latena) ali antike. Vzorce smo pregledali, jih orientirali in pripravili preparate. Za identifikacijo lesa smo uporabili računalniški identifikacijski ključ Intkey. Identificirali smo 12 vzorcev iz obdobja prazgodovine in ugotovili, da so 3 vzorci iz hrastovine (Quercus sp.), 2 iz jelovine (Abies alba), ter po 1 iz jelševine (Alnus glutinosa), jesenovine (Fraxinus sp.), tisovine (Taxus baccata) in vrbovine (Salix sp.). 3 vzorcev nismo mogli identificirati, ker so bili preslabo ohranjeni. Identificirali smo tudi 83 vzorcev iz mlajše železne dobe (latena). Rezultati so pokazali, da sta 2 vzorca iz bukovine (Fagus sylvatica), 2 iz gabrovine (Carpinus betulus), 24 iz hrastovine (Quercus sp.), 10 iz jelovine (Abies alba), 9 iz jelševine (Alnus glutinosa), 1 iz jesenovine (Fraxinus sp.), 2 iz leskovine (Corylus avellana), po 1 iz smrekovine (Picea abies) in tisovine (Taxus baccata), 9 iz topolovine (Populus sp.) in 17 iz vrbovega lesa (Salix sp.). 2 vzorca sta bila iz lesa družine rožnic (Rosaceae), 2 vzorcev pa nismo mogli identificirati. Primerjali smo tudi izbor lesnih vrst in rabo lesa v različnih obdobjih.

Keywords

arheološki les;identifikacija lesa;prazgodovina;železna doba;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publisher: [D. Kržišnik]
UDC: 902.67
COBISS: 1952905 Link will open in a new window
Views: 31
Downloads: 1
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Anatomical research od archaeological wood
Secondary abstract: We have identified archaeological wet wood from an archaeological site in Ljubljana. Archaeologists had previously divided the wood into 3 groups according to its presumable origin from the prehistory, late Iron Age (La Tène) or ancient Roman age. We inspected all the samples, oriented them and prepared microscopic slides for observation under the light microscope. We used the computer identification key Intkey for wood identification. We identified wood of 12 prehistoric samples and found that they belonged to the following genera or species: 3 of them were oak (Quercus sp.), 2 fir (Abies alba), 1 alder (Alnus glutinosa), 1 ash wood (Fraxinus sp.), 1 yew (Taxus baccata) and 1 willow (Salix sp.). 3 samples could not be identified because they were poorly preserved. We also identified 83 samples from the Iron Age. The results showed that 2 samples were beech (Fagus sylvatica), 2 hornbeam (Carpinus betulus), 24 oak (Quercus sp.), 10 fir (Abies alba), 9 alder (Alnus glutinosa), 1 ash (Fraxinus sp.), 2 hazel (Corylus avellana), 1 spruce (Picea abies), 1 yew (Taxus baccata), 9 poplar (Populus sp.) and 17 willow (Salix sp.) samples. 2 wood specimens belonged to Rosaceae family; the other 2 remained unidentified. The selection of wood species used in different periods was also compared.
Secondary keywords: archaeological wood;wood identification;prehistory;iron age;
Type (COBISS): Diploma project paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fak., Oddelek za lesarstvo
Pages: VII, 34 f.
ID: 24512007