Spodbujanje branja literarnih besedil kot vloga sodobne literarne kritike

magistrsko delo

Danijela Sitar (Author), Alojzija Zupan Sosič (Mentor), Vanesa Matajc (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrsko delo se ukvarja s sodobno literarno kritiko in njeno spodbudo k literarnemu branju. Najprej predstavim teorijo literarne kritike, njenega razvoja in modifikacije v sodobnosti, ki se deli predvsem na revialno in spletno kritiko. Predstavim koncepte literarnega branja, literarnega bralca in drugega branja. V drugem delu sem analizirala sto sodobnih literarnih kritik, od tega polovico revialnih in polovico spletnih. Analiza je pokazala, da spodbujanje branja preko literarne kritike ni dovolj izrazito, da bi lahko govorili o funkciji, pač pa zgolj o (slučajni) posledici kvalitetne kritike. V magistrskem delu ugotavljam, da je revialna kritika bolj kvalitetna, saj obravnava bolj zvrstno raznolika dela, jih bolj raznoliko vrednoti, jih večkrat primerja z drugimi literarnimi teksti, prav tako prinaša več argumentov kot spletna kritika.

Keywords

empirična literarna veda;sodobna literarna kritika;literarno vrednotenje;revialna kritika;spletna kritika;branje;bralna kultura;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2024
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL FF - Faculty of Arts
Publisher:	[D. Sitar]
UDC:	82.09
COBISS:	205145347
Views:	121
Downloads:	19
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Fostering Literary Text Reading: The Role of Contemporary Literary Criticism
Secondary abstract:	The main aim of the master's thesis is to examine the role of contemporary literary criticism in fostering literary text reading. The first part of the thesis establishes the theory of literary criticism, its development, and modifications in modern times, which are primarily divided into print and online criticism. Additionally, the concepts of literary reading, the literary reader, and other forms of reading are developed. The second part of the thesis focuses on the analysis of one hundred contemporary literary criticisms, half of which are from print sources and half from online sources. The analysis shows that the encouragement of reading through literary criticism is not sufficiently distinct to be considered a function but rather a (coincidental) consequence of quality criticism. A key finding of the thesis is that print criticism offers a higher quality of analysis than online criticism, as it deals with a wider range of genres, evaluates them more diversely, consistently compares reviewed works to other relevant texts, and provides more arguments than online criticism.
Secondary keywords:	empirical literary studies;literary criticism;literary evaluation;print criticism;online criticism;reading;reading culture;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	1011044
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za slovenistiko
Pages:	70 str.
ID:	24543234