Slovenska religiologija v digitalni dobi

Abstract

Prispevek po predstavitvi ustanovitve Slovenskega religiološkega društva orisuje zgodovino religiologije kot znanosti in začetek akademske religiologije v Sloveniji. Tu obstaja pluralnost razmišljanja: religiologi, izhajajoči iz teološke formacije, vidijo v veri, ki je odnos človeka do presežnosti, srce vsake religije; tisti s sociološko formacijo pa dopuščajo obstoj religije brez vere. Konkretno se to odraža v registru verskih skupnosti na Ministrstvu za kulturo RS, kjer najdemo veliko skupnosti, ki nimajo z versko dejavnostjo nobene povezave. Avtor v nadaljevanju izpostavlja značilnosti razmišljanja in delovanja v digitalni dobi – anonimnost, neodgovornost in trenutnost odnosa –, ki vplivajo na sedanjo versko prakso posameznikov in na religiološko razumevanje religije brez vere – to je brez odnosa do presežnega. Sledi teza, da noben urad, niti državni, posameznim skupinam ne more potrjevati ali dajati verske identitete. Edini možen način prepoznavanja verske identitete v skupnostih je namreč medreligijski dialog.

Keywords

digitalna doba;religija;Urad za verske skupnosti;medreligijski dialog;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2023
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL TEOF - Theological Faculty
UDC:	2-67:004.9(497.4)
COBISS:	179020803
ISSN:	0006-5722
Views:	14
Downloads:	6
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Slovenian religiology in the digital age
Secondary abstract:	After information about the establishment of the Slovenian Association for the Study of Religions, the article outlines the history of religiology as a science and the beginning of academic religiology in Slovenia. There is a plurality of way of thinking there. Religionologists coming from a theological formation see faith as man’s relationship to transcendence as the heart of every religion. Those who have a sociological formation allow the existence of religion without faith. Concretely, this is reflected in the register of religious communities at the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Slovenia, where we find many communities that have no connection with faith activity. In the following, the author points out the characteristics of thinking and acting in the digital age: anonymity, irresponsibility, and immediacy of relationship, which affect the current religious practice of individuals and the religious understanding of religion without religion, i.e. without a relationship to the transcendent. In the end, the thesis is that no office, not even a state one, can confirm or give religious identity to individual groups. Interreligious dialogue is the only possible way of recognizing religious identity in communities.
Secondary keywords:	digital age;religion;Office for Religious Communities;interreligious dialogue;
Type (COBISS):	Article
Pages:	str. 923-933
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ83
Issue:	ǂ[št.] ǂ4
Chronology:	2023
DOI:	10.34291/BV2023/04/Osredkar
ID:	25318295