pravni vidiki
Sebastijan Furlani (Author), Senko Pličanič (Mentor)

Abstract

Posegi v okolje predstavljajo tematiko širokega zanimanja, zato se različne interesne skupine, v luči čedalje močnejšega zavedanja pomembnosti zdravega, varnega in nasploh primernega okolja za življenje, vključujejo v postopke odločanja, ki takšne posege naslavljajo. Poleg predlagatelja posega, to je navadno država, občina ali zasebnik, se v te iste postopke, z namenom varovanja lastnih pravic in uveljavljanja pripadajočih procesnih upravičenj, vključujejo tudi tretje osebe, ki jih bo določen poseg zadeval oziroma lahko prizadel. Procesno upravičenje za vključitev pa je nemalokrat podeljeno tudi nevladnim organizacijam (v nadaljevanju NVO), in sicer v vlogi zaščitnika javnega interesa varstva okolja, ohranjanja narave in urejenosti prostora ter upravičenca dostopa do informacij o okoljskem odločanju. Preko pregleda relevantne mednarodne zakonodaje (Aarhuške Konvencije) in evropskih pravnih virov ugotovim zahteve ter okvirje, ki jih mora nacionalna zakonodaja vsebovati. Ugotovitve apliciram na slovensko pravno ureditev in po preverbi potrdim prvo hipotezo; primernost slovenske pravne ureditve vloge NVO, ozirajoč se na nadnacionalne zahteve. Kljub temu se v nadaljevanju preizprašujem glede določenih odprtih vprašanj, kar me napelje na drugo hipotezo glede (ne)učinkovitosti vloge NVO v postopkih odločanja. Raziščem širši koncept varstva narave, ki na mikro nivoju morebiti ni viden, ter deduciram formulacijo javnega interesa v smeri preverbe, kaj vse je lahko javni interes, ki pravzaprav predstavlja postulat za definiranje vloge NVO v predmetnih postopkih okoljskega odločanja. Na podlagi razčlembe, druge hipoteze ne zavrnem niti je ne sprejmem, temveč zavzamem holistični pristop kot pravilen način razumevanja te kompleksne tematike.

Keywords

nevladne organizacije;postopki odločanja;posegi v okolje;javni interes;kolizija interesov;Aarhuška konvencija;Zakon o varstvu okolja;Zakon o nevladnih organizacijah;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [S. Furlani]
UDC: 061.2:502(043.2)
COBISS: 226395651 Link will open in a new window
Views: 63
Downloads: 15
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The Role of NGOs in Environmental Impact Procedures: Legal Aspects
Secondary abstract: Environmental impact procedures are a topic of broad interest. With increasing awareness of the importance of a healthy, safe and generally liveable environment, various stakeholders are engaged in decision-making processes regarding such interventions. Beyond the primary proponents of development—typically the state, municipalities, or private individuals—third parties who may be affected by these developments also participate in these procedures to protect their rights and assert procedural rights. In many cases, the procedural right to intervene is extended to non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as advocates of public interest related to environmental protection, nature conservation, spatial planning, and access to information on environmental decision-making. Reviewing relevant international frameworks, particularly the Aarhus Convention and European legal sources, I identify the requirements and standards that national legislation must incorporate. After verification, I apply these findings to the Slovenian legal framework and confirm my first hypothesis: the adequacy of Slovenia's legal framework in light of supranational requirements. However, I address certain open questions that lead to my second hypothesis regarding NGOs' (in)effectiveness in these decision-making processes. I examine a broader concept of nature protection, which may not be immediately apparent, and develop a formulation of the public interest to investigate the full scope of what it may constitute. Based on my findings, I neither fully confirm nor reject the second hypothesis but conclude that a holistic approach is the most appropriate means to understand this complex subject.
Secondary keywords: Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: IX, 49 f.
ID: 25865530