diplomsko delo
Tanja Djokić (Author), Matjaž Tratnik (Mentor)

Abstract

Postopek pridobivanja dokazov v mednarodni trgovinski arbitraži se znatno razlikuje od postopka pridobivanja dokazov v sodnih civilnih postopkih, saj je v mednarodnem arbitražnem postopku le-ta, v skladu z načelom avtonomije volje strank in fleksibilnostjo arbitražnega postopka, v diskreciji strank oz. v odsotnosti dogovora med strankami, v diskreciji arbitražnega tribunala. Mandatorna pravila, ki jih je potrebno upoštevati pri oblikovanju mednarodnega arbitražnega postopka v zvezi s pridobivanjem dokazov lahko omejimo na spoštovanje procesnega javnega reda, ki v dokaznem postopku vključuje načelo avtonomije volje strank, načelo enakopravne obravnave strank in načelo obojestranskega zaslišanja strank. Arbitražna pravila, bodisi institucionalna ali ad hoc, navadno ne vsebujejo specifičnih določb v zvezi s pridobivanjem dokazov v postopku. Gre za namerno pravno praznino, ki naj omogoči čim večjo fleksibilnost arbitražnega postopka. Toda takšna praznina pogosto privede do sporov med strankami; še posebej kadar le-te prihajajo iz različnih pravnih okolij in posledično imajo različno predstavo o vsebini temeljnih načel, ki naj jih arbitražni tribunal spoštuje v zvezi z dokaznim postopkom. Namen IBA Rules of Evidence, ki jih je sprejela IBA v letu 2010, je zapolniti pravno praznino v zvezi pridobivanjem dokazov v mednarodnih arbitražnih postopkih, ne da bi pri tem bistveno omejevala fleksibilnost postopka. IBA Rules of Evidence predstavljajo kompromis med anglosaškim in kontinentalnim pravnim sistemom v zvezi s pridobivanjem dokazov v mednarodni arbitraži, so odraz aktualne mednarodne arbitražne pravne prakse in pomemben pravni vir v mednarodni arbitraži. Aplikacija IBA Rules of Evidence zagotavlja udeležencem arbitražnega postopka učinkovit, pravičen in ekonomičen postopek pridobivanja dokaznega gradiva.

Keywords

mednarodno pravo;mednarodna trgovinska arbitraža;IBA Rules of Evidence;dokazni postopek;listinski dokazi;izvedenske priče;arbitražne priče;presoja dokazov;diplomska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [T. Djokić]
UDC: 341.236(043.2)
COBISS: 4895275 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1230
Downloads: 187
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION ON BASIS OF THE IBA RULES ON TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 2010
Secondary abstract: Obtaining evidence in the international commerical arbitration significantly differs from civil court proceedings. Obtainging evidence in international commercial arbitration is in accordance with the principle of autonomy of the parties and the flexibility of the arbitration proceedings, in the discretion of the parties, or absence of agreement between the parties, in the arbitral tribunal's discretion. Mandatory provisions which must be taken into account when determining the international arbitration proceedings in conection with the evidence can be limited to the procedural public policy. Procedural public policy includes the principle of parties' autonomy, the principle of equal treatement between the parties and parties' right to be heard. Arbitration rules, either institutional or ad hoc, usullly do not contain specific provisions related to evidence proceedings. This is a deliberate legal vacuum which intent is to allow the greatest possible flexibility of arbitration proceedings. However, such gaps often lead to disputes between the parties, especially when they are coming from different legal backgrounds and have different ideas about the content of the basic principles which are to be respected in international arbitration. The purpose of the IBA Rules of Evidence, which were addopted by IBA in 2010, is to fill in the legal vacuum in relation to the evidence in international arbitration, whitout significantly limiting the flexbility of the procedure. IBA Rules of Evidence represent a compromise between common law and civil law approach in relation to obtaining evidence in international arbitration; are a refleciton of the current arbitration law practice and an important legal source in international arbitration. Application of IBA Rules of Evidence grants the parties the efficient, equitable and economical method of obtaining evidence. IBA Rules of Evidence do not regulate all possible procedures in relation to evidence. Only the most commonly used methods of presenting the evidence are regulated in it, namely: documentary evidence, witnesses, expert witnesses, arbitration experts, inspections. In addition, the IBA Rules of Evidence define guidelines that should be taken in account when assessing the evidence.
Secondary keywords: IBA Rules of Evidence;international commercial arbitration;the taking of evidence;documentary evidence;witnesses;expert witnesses;tribunal appointed experts;assessment of evidence;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages: IX, 81 f.
ID: 8728808