Marko Lah (Author)

Abstract

Teorija transakcijskih stroškov (TTS) ima mnoge implikacije tudi za mala in srednja podjetja (MSP). Že v klasični politični ekonomiji je mogoče najti diskurz v smeri TTS, ki pa jih je v nadaljnjem razvoju neoklasična teorija podjetja, nerazdružljivo povezana s teorijo popolne konkurence, izničila. Srednje veliko neoklasično popolno konkurenčno podjetje opravlja paradigmatično vlogo, torej je veljavna tudi za velika podjetja. Kljub temu da v neoklasični popolni konkurenci trgi delujejo popolno, brez transakcijskih trenj menjave, je TTS mogoče vključiti. Po drugi strani pa postkeynesianska teorija paradigmatično izpostavlja veliko oligopolno podjetje (megakorporacijo), pri tem pa prezre vlogo manjših podjetij (MSP), ki jih vidi predvsem kot konkurente velikih. Prispevek se osredotoča na načine povezav med velikim podjetjem, hkrati središčem omrežij in transakcijskih stroškov, ki nastanejo v povezavah z MSP. Neoklasična teorija le-te pojasnjuje z marginalističnim cost/benefit aparatom (optimizacijo), postkeynesianska teorija pa z institucionalnimi dejavniki. Slednji pristop poudarja inferiornost ekonomskega položaja MSP, kar se kaže predvsem na področjih cene in perspektiv rasti.

Keywords

Mala in srednja podjetja;Postkeynesianizem;Transakcijski stroški;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
UDC: 334.72:330.821.5
COBISS: 32430941 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 0040-3598
Parent publication: Teorija in praksa
Views: 800
Downloads: 112
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: Transaction cost theory (TCT) holds many implications, including for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The discourse of transaction costs can even be found in the beginnings of classical political economy, but it was later overlooked upon the rise of the neoclassical theory of the firm, which is essentially and intrinsically connected to the assumption of perfect competition. In neoclassical theory, a medium-sized firm within a perfectly competitive market plays a paradigmatic role, large firms included. Although markets in perfect competition function perfectly and without any transaction costs, TCT might still be applied to them. On the other hand, Post Keynesian theory builds its paradigm on a large oligopolistic firm (megacorporation), viewing SMEs only as their competitors. The distinction between SMEs as competitors and SMEs as subcontractors of big corporations (network hubs) is emphasised. While neoclassical theory views this relation within a marginal cost/benefit apparatus, Post Keynesian theory stresses the importance of institutional arrangements. The inferior position of SMEs as subcontractors is demonstrated by the price relations between them and the growth perspectives of SMEs.
Secondary keywords: Small business;Postkeynesianism;Transaction costs;
Type (COBISS): Not categorized
Pages: str. 699-716, 905
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ50
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ5/6
Chronology: sep.-dec. 2013
ID: 9169525