Vidiki (ne)deliberativnosti v parlamentarnih razpravah o Družinskem zakoniku

Metka Kuhar (Author), Andraž Petrovčič (Author)

Abstract

V prispevku na vzorcu 525 izjav iz slovenskega parlamenta predstavimo izbrane vidike (ne)deliberativnosti v razpravah o Družinskem zakoniku (DZak) v obdobju 2009-2011, pri čemer na osnovi konceptualno nadgrajenega Indeksa kakovosti diskurza (DQI) analiziramo naslednje deliberativne standarde: participacijo akterjev, utemeljevanje zahtev v razpravah znotraj zakonodajnih teles in (ne)spoštljivost. Rezultati kažejo na sorazmerno nizko stopnjo deliberativnosti glede na večino standardov, ki so vključeni v DQI. Poleg relativno visokega deleža izjav brez argumentacije in nespoštljivosti so posebej izrazite razlike glede na spol razpravljavcev, njihovo (ne)podporo zakoniku, pa tudi glede na to, ali gre za predstavnike političnih skupin, civilne družbe ali vlade.

Keywords

parlamenti;Družinski zakonik;Slovenija;Posvetovalna demokracija;Družinsko pravo;Parlament;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2015
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
UDC:	321.011:347.61/.64
COBISS:	33786973
ISSN:	0040-3598
Parent publication:	Teorija in praksa
Views:	693
Downloads:	144
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	In this article, we shed light on selected aspects of (non)deliberation drawing on a sample of 525 statements from the Slovenian Parliament made during discussions on the proposed Family Act between 2009 and 2011. Applying a conceptually refined Discourse Quality Index (DQI), we explore the following deliberative standards: participation of actors, argumentation of claims presented within the discussions, and (dis)respect. The results show a relatively low level of deliberation in terms of most of the DQI standards. In addition to the relatively high share of statements without argument and disrespect, consistent differences can be observed according to the gender of the speakers, their (non)support of the Family Act, and the fact of whether they were a spokesperson for a political group, civil society or the government.
Secondary keywords:	Deliberative democracy;Family law;Parliament;
Type (COBISS):	Not categorized
Pages:	str. 1124-1142, 1247
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ52
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ6
Chronology:	nov.-dec. 2015
ID:	9169676