Odnos držav članic EU do načela primarnosti prava EU

magistrsko delo

Živa Šuta (Avtor), Janja Hojnik (Mentor), Petra Weingerl (Komentor)

Povzetek

Magistrsko delo obravnava odzive držav članic EU do načela primarnosti prava EU, posebej pa se osredotoča na njihove razloge za odstopanje od tega načela. Čeprav ima načelo primarnosti v sodni praksi Sodišča EU skoraj 60-letno zgodovino, prihajajo namreč v zadnjem desetletju v ospredje stališča določenih držav članic, ki ga iz različnih razlogov poskušajo omajati. Primere takšnih odstopanj je bilo v preteklosti moč zaslediti v državah članicah z različnimi značilnostmi in zgodovino, od Češke, Danske, Nemčije in Romunije do nedavnega primera na Poljskem. Na eni strani je cilj magistrskega dela poudariti pomen spoštovanja prava EU, k čemur so se s pristopom k EU brezpogojno zavezale vse države članice, in na drugi strani na tehtnico postaviti njihovo suverenost in nacionalni ustavni red. Z zavedanjem, da odstopanja obstajajo, je končni cilj magistrskega dela ugotoviti, s pomočjo katerih pravnih postopkov je moč ubraniti pravni red EU. V magistrskem delu ugotavljam, da načelo primarnosti per se ni sporno. Nikoli v praksi nacionalnih sodišč, ki je obravnavana v tej magistrski nalogi, niso ta zanikala samega obstoja oz. nastanka načela primarnosti. Čeprav bi lahko države članice (sicer neutemeljeno) zatrjevale, da to načelo denimo ni nikjer zapisano, njegovih temeljev in obstoja niso osporavale. Niso torej trdile, da načelo primarnosti ne obstaja. Trdile so, da se kljub temu da obstaja, v konkretnem primeru (iz različnih razlogov) ne sme upoštevati. Načelo primarnosti je že bilo tema nekaterih zaključnih del in doktorskih disertacij v Sloveniji. Doprinos te magistrske naloge je dvojni. Prvi se kaže v tem, da je načelo primarnosti predstavljeno skozi zgodbo EU, od nastanka in širitve do kršitev njenega pravnega reda in posledične postopne dezintegracije oz. izstopa države članice iz EU. Pomembnejši doprinos pa se kaže v poskusu primerjave razlogov nacionalnih sodišč pri odstopanju od spoštovanja načela primarnosti. Skozi ta vidik je mogoče razumeti posledice njihovih odločitev za učinkovitost pravnega reda EU.

Ključne besede

razmerje med nacionalnim pravom in pravom EU;temeljna načela;primarnost prava EU;Costa proti E.N.E.L.;suverenost držav članic;ustavni pluralizem;ultra vires doktrina;postopek predhodnega odločanja;postopki zoper državo članico.;

Podatki

Jezik:	Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:	2022
Tipologija:	2.09 - Magistrsko delo
Organizacija:	UM PF - Pravna fakulteta
Založnik:	[Ž. Šuta]
UDK:	341.176(043.3)
COBISS:	122481155
Št. ogledov:	18
Št. prenosov:	12
Ocena:	0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki:

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik:	Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov:	EU Member States' Approach to the Principle of Primacy of EU law
Sekundarni povzetek:	This master’s thesis examines the different approaches of EU Member States to the principle of primacy of EU law and focuses in particular on their reasons for deviating from this principle. Although the principle of primacy has a nearly 60-year history in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the EU, in the last decade the positions of certain Member States have come to the fore with which they are attempting to undermine the principle for a variety of reasons. Examples of such deviations have been found in Member States with different characteristics and history, from the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany and Romania to the recent case in Poland. On the one hand, the aim of this master’s thesis is to emphasize the importance of respecting EU law, which all Member States unconditionally committed to by joining the EU, and on the other hand, to put their sovereignty and national constitutional order in the balance. With the awareness that deviations exist, the ultimate goal of this master’s thesis is to determine which legal procedures can be used to defend the EU legal order as a whole. In the master’s thesis I discover that the principle of primacy is not inherently disputed. In the practice of national courts, as discussed, no court has ever denied the existence or emergence of the principle of primacy. Although Member States could (inaccurately) claim for example that this principle is not codified in EU legislation, they did not dispute its foundations or existence. As a result, they did not assert that the primacy principle does not exist. They contended that, despite its existence, it should not be considered in the particular case. The principle of primacy has already been the subject of some master’s and doctoral theses in Slovenia. The added value of this master’s thesis is twofold. The first manifests itself in the fact that the principle of primacy is presented throughout the story of the EU, from its creation and expansion to violations of its legal order and the resulting gradual disintegration by withdrawal of Member States from the EU. A more significant contribution is demonstrated by the attempt to compare the reasons given by national courts when departing from the principle of primacy. This aspect allows one to comprehend the implications of their decisions for the effectiveness of the EU legal order.
Sekundarne ključne besede:	relationship between national and EU law;fundamental principles;primacy of EU law;Costa v E.N.E.L.;national sovereignty;constitutional pluralism;ultra vires doctrine;preliminary reference procedure;infringement actions against Member States.;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Vrsta dela (COBISS):	Magistrsko delo/naloga
Komentar na gradivo:	Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Strani:	1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (71 str.))
ID:	16124016