Sekundarni povzetek: |
In industry, metal workpieces are often heat-treated to improve their mechanical properties, but it also leads to undesirable deformations of their geometry. Due to the high hardness achieved (60 HRC or more), conventional straightening processes like bending and rolling treatment are not effective, since failure of the material occurs. In this regard, the influence of plastic surface deformation on the geometry changes of hardened metal workpieces was analyzed as part of the doctoral thesis.
A laboratory experiment was carried out, creating a database of 3063 samples based on controlled input of plastic surface deformations, high-resolution acquisition of the workpiece geometry, acceleration measurements, and acoustic detection of straightening strikes (strikes that plastically deform the workpiece surface). In addition, we captured the sounds of controlled strikes that do not permanently deform the surface of the workpiece. Using a U-Net neural network, we developed a model to predict the geometry change of a hardened metal workpiece as a function of the applied plastic surface deformations. In addition, we proposed a novel deep convolutional network architecture for regression that allows two inputs of different data types and dimensions (the sound of the straightening strike and the representation of the workpiece geometry with the straightening strike data contained in it) and a multidimensional output (the predicted change in the workpiece geometry). We have also developed a deep neural network model that effectively predicts the geometry of a metal workpiece based only on the sound of controlled strikes that do not deform the surface of the workpiece.
The performance of the developed prediction models was evaluated using the relative absolute error (RAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and relative squared error (RSE). The best model for predicting the shape of the workpiece had excellent prediction performance on the test data, with average RAE, RMSE, and RSE values of 0.0499, 0.0129, and 0.0040, respectively.
When sound was included in the prediction model, the RAE, RMSE, and RSE values were 0.0739, 0.0185, and 0.0075, respectively, but when the shape of the workpiece was predicted using sound alone, the average RAE, RMSE, and RSE values were 0.7439, 0.1744, and 0.5638, respectively. |